Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4 vs Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII, model available from 2003 to 2005.
It has 2.0 Turbo 265HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2005.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Toyota Celica VII, model available from 1999 to 2006.
It has 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual
Mitsubishi

21 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

265 > 192 hp
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII has by 73 hp more horsepower compared to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to bigger horsepower. Also getting ahead of cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

6.1 > 7.4 s
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 6.1 s, which is 18 percent quicker than the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
38

Trunk capacity

430 > 367 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for journeys, which could hold more luggage , pick the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4. The Toyota is equiped with by 17 percent less capable boot in comparison to the Toyota Celica VII so probably you would be able to carry one little suitcase less. Examining the trunk pay attention to its dimensions which have notable effect on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

245 > 225 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII is greater than this of the Toyota Celica VII by 20 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mitsubishi to travel quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,770 > 1,731 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4 is larger only by 2 % compared with the Toyota Celica VII and is not really important. The average for the „S” class amounts to around 1,792 mm and is by 1 % bigger than the same feature of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII.
15

Wheelbase

2,631 > 2,600 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4 has 31 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,796 cc
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4 has 200 cubic centimeters greater engine size in relation to the Toyota. As the difference is not big, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII should accelerate a bit better, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

415 > 350 kg
6

Length

4,489 > 4,330 mm
The Mitsubishi is 4 percent longer when compared to the Toyota Celica VII. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,500 > 1,480 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For people who like a comfortable vehicle the 4-door Mitsubishi is a way better to use. However, for young drivers that are in to sporty design of the car we suggest choosing the 2-door Toyota.
1

Model release date

2003 > 1999
Given that the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual's production started only 4 years earlier than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII might have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,449 > 1,305 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII, which is by 144 mm higher than the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

235 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

6,500 > 7,800 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

1,886 > 1,560 kg
0

Front track

1,500 > 1,490 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 50 %
0

Curb weight

1,470 > 1,214 kg

Toyota

7 reasons for Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.4 > 11.1 l
The Toyota consumes 2.7 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 24 percent will be quite very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will result in a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

11.5 > 15.4 l
The Toyota Celica VII uses 3.9 l of petrol less in the city in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The Toyota, which represents S segment, uses 2 liters less fuel, which constitutes by 15 percent lower fuel consumption in comparison to the average in its segment. The difference in fuel consumption between compared vehicles is quite big, so remember that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should check cars with similar characteristics.
19

Range

655 > 459 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 49 l
The Mitsubishi gives way to the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Toyota Celica VII is able to store by 14 % more fuel in relation to its contender.
12

Urban range

478 > 325 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Toyota Celica VII have a higher speed count in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII which means that Toyota Celica VII will achieve faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even feel the difference.
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2005

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 Turbo 265HP manual 4x4 Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,886 kg 1,560 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK