Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual vs Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic

Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Bull-Doser All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Suzuki Reno, model available from 2004 to 2008.
It has 2.0 127HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan, model available from 2003 to 2008.
It has 1.6 i 16V 98HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic
Suzuki

11 reasons for Suzuki Reno 2.0 127KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

127 > 98 hp
The Suzuki Reno is equipped with petrol which delivers by 30 % more horsepower over the Mitsubishi, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It seems to be better option to those who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 10.3 l
The Suzuki Reno consumes 1 percent less petrol in the city in relation to the Mitsubishi. The Suzuki Reno, that represents C class, consumes 1.5 l less fuel. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small family cars segment equals to 8.7 l, while the Suzuki Reno uses by 18 % more amount of fuel than the average.
22

Width

1,730 > 1,695 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The width of the Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual is larger by 2 percent in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan and is not really relevant. The average for the „lower middle” segment is approximately 1,703 mm and is by 27 mm larger than the width of the Suzuki Reno.
15

Wheelbase

2,600 > 2,599 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Suzuki Reno has 1 millimeter longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi Lancer VIII. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Suzuki Reno should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,583 cc
The engine capacity of the Suzuki Reno is by 413 cc bigger in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII. For this reason the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Suzuki Reno will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
4

Rear track

1,480 > 1,470 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and because of that the Suzuki Reno, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats enlarging a luggage compartment, has the edge on the 4-door Mitsubishi Lancer VIII which in turn has smaller lid and a partition behind the rear seats.
1

Model release date

2004 > 2003
Given that the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII was introduced only 1 year prior to the Suzuki Reno, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Suzuki may feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,447 > 1,445 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 2 millimeters to the advantage of the Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,480 > 1,472 mm
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98KM automat in comparison to Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual

Reasons for
6

Length

4,484 > 4,293 mm
The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII is 4 % longer in relation to the Suzuki Reno. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven but the Suzuki will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox in the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan despite having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is less tired. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Suzuki Reno 2.0 127HP manual Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    End of model sale 2008 2008
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK