Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual vs Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic

Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Toyota Auris I Hatchback, model available from 2006.
It has 1.33VVT-i 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan, model available from 2003 to 2008.
It has 1.6 i 16V 98HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic
Toyota

12 reasons for Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

100 > 98 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Toyota which has by 2 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Mitsubishi, which makes this vehicle slightly better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Toyota Auris I should as well provide somewhat better efficiency in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 8.1 l
The Toyota Auris I Hatchback consumes 28 % fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII. The difference in the amount of 28 % will be quite significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

7.1 > 10.3 l
The Toyota consumes 3.2 l of petrol fewer running around the town in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic. The Toyota, that represents compact class, burns up 1.6 l fewer petrol, which is by 18 percent better result in comparison to the average in its class. The difference in fuel economy between these two cars is quite big, so note that so as to the comparison have a sense, you should select cars with similar characteristics.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.1 > 13.6 s
The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared to the Toyota. The difference at the level of 0.5 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into account for choosing one of these two vehicles.
22

Width

1,761 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Toyota is 66 mm wider than the Mitsubishi. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

948 > 633 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 49 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Toyota that can hold 14 percent more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan. The average fuel container capacity in the compact class, which is represented by the Toyota, equals 52 l, whereas in lower middle segment (represented by the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic) it amounts to 52 l.
12

Urban range

775 > 485 km
4

Rear track

1,521 > 1,470 mm
1

Model release date

2006 > 2003
Given that the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic's production began only 3 years prior to the Toyota Auris I, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Toyota Auris I Hatchback may have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,513 > 1,445 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Toyota, which is by 5 % higher than the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan, would be appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front track

1,527 > 1,472 mm

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98KM automat in comparison to Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

430 > 352 l
The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan features 78 liters bigger trunk in comparison to the Toyota Auris I. Such a difference is quite big and it will is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Mitsubishi has 37 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its class. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

176 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII is higher as compared to this of the Toyota Auris I Hatchback which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 1 percent is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,599 > 2,596 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 3 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Toyota Auris I Hatchback. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,583 > 1,329 cc
The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII has 254 cubic centimeters greater engine size compared to the Toyota Auris I Hatchback. Because the difference is small, the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan should accelerate a bit dynamically, if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,484 > 4,215 mm
The Mitsubishi is 269 mm longer when compared to the Toyota. The length of the car is significant in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan will be better driven but the Toyota Auris I will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
3

Number of doors

4 > 3
The three-door model of Toyota Auris I Hatchback allows to easily place stuff into a boot, whereas 4-door Mitsubishi Lancer VIII offers more convenient getting into the car, more quiet cabin at the expense of smaller boot lid.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a substantial impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may use more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual Mitsubishi Lancer VIII Sedan 1.6 i 16V 98HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,721 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK