Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP vs Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander II, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.0 i 136HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Toyota RAV4 III, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.0 i 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4
Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136KM in comparison to Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

882 > 586 l
With more luggage capacity the Mitsubishi will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional one compared with the Toyota. If the size of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP will be better to buy as it is about 296 l larger than the boot of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,689 > 1,468 l
19

Fuel tank

62 > 61 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mitsubishi Outlander II that is able to take by 2 percent more gasoline in relation to the Toyota.
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,556 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander II has 120 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4. As a result the Mitsubishi is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
6

Length

4,665 > 4,395 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander II is 6 percent longer when compared to the Toyota RAV4 III. The length of the car is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Outlander II very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven ,however, the Toyota RAV4 III will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .

Toyota

4 reasons for Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

152 > 136 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 which has by 12 % horsepower more when compared to the Mitsubishi, which makes this car somewhat faster. With more horsepower the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 will also give a bit better flexiblility in specific gears.
22

Width

1,819 > 1,804 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 is 15 mm wider than the Mitsubishi. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
4

Rear track

1,559 > 1,543 mm
1

Height

1,721 > 1,680 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4, which is by 2 % higher than the Mitsubishi, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 2,069 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK