Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual

Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander II, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.0 i 136HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2012.
Drive has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Toyota Urban Cruiser, model available from 2009 to 2012.
It has 1.3 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual
Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136KM in comparison to Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

136 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mitsubishi Outlander II that has by 36 more horsepower when compared to the Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual. Consequently the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP is able to achieve higher top speed. Because of more horsepower the Mitsubishi Outlander II should as well give noticeably better flexiblility in specific gears.
38

Trunk capacity

882 > 314 l
The boot of the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP is 181 % larger in comparison to the Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Mitsubishi will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can load.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,689 > 747 l
22

Width

1,804 > 1,725 mm
Width of a car influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Outlander II is larger by 79 mm in relation to the Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” class is around 1,797 millimeters and is by 7 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mitsubishi Outlander II.
19

Fuel tank

62 > 43 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mitsubishi that is able to take by 19 l more petrol than the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,458 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 218 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,665 > 3,932 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander II is 19 % longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven ,however, the Toyota Urban Cruiser will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,543 > 1,490 mm
1

Height

1,680 > 1,525 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Mitsubishi Outlander II, which is by 10 percent higher than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, would be better option for you. However, presented cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,485 mm

Toyota

3 reasons for Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2009 > 2006
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP's production started only 3 years before the Toyota Urban Cruiser, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Toyota Urban Cruiser may have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Front overhang

784 > 990 mm
0

Rear overhang

686 > 1,004 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Outlander II 2.0 i 136HP Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,589 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK