Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

12 reasons for

Opel Mokka, model available from 2012.
It has 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Opel

12 reasons for Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.9 > 7.7 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual's advantage. This automobile uses 1.8 l fewer petrol in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual is classified, is 7.5 l while the Opel Mokka uses by 21 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 197 Nm
The Opel has 2 percent more torque in relation to the Mitsubishi. Even though a large number of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it reflects the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is little so the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.9 > 10.8 s
The Opel accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 9.9 s, which is 0.9 s quicker in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Top speed

193 > 184 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Opel is greater in relation to this of the Mitsubishi by 9 kilometers/hour, which allows the Opel Mokka to travel quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 kilometers per hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,850 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that the winner is is this of the Opel Mokka. The engine of the Mitsubishi Outlander III achieves its full efficiency at 4,195 revolutions/minute which is by 56 % lower compared with the Opel Mokka.
19

Range

915 > 800 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Opel Mokka have a higher speed count than the Mitsubishi which means that Opel should have better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
4

Rear track

1,542 > 1,540 mm
0

Front overhang

945 > 953 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Rear overhang

779 > 1,029 mm
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is 7 horsepowers grater when compared to the Opel Mokka. As the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance largely.
22

Width

1,799 > 1,777 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV is widther only by 1 percent than the Opel Mokka and is not really important. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 2 mm larger than the same attribute of the Mitsubishi.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III which can carry 5 l more fuel in relation to the Opel Mokka. The medium fuel tank size in the small off-road 4x4 segment, from which the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual comes from, is 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Opel Mokka) it amounts to 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,680 > 2,551 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual has 5 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Opel Mokka. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi Outlander III should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,365 cc
The Mitsubishi Outlander III has 46 percent larger engine displacement in relation to the Opel. The difference is relatively substantia. As a result the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine size equals worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,654 > 4,278 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III is 9 percent longer than the Opel Mokka. Long vehicles have more interior space and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi Outlander III occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value convenient rides, the Opel may appeal to women as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,682 > 1,658 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 1 % to the advantage of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is small and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5

Cars specifications

Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,600 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK