Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual vs Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org DY5W-sport Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

16 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

15 reasons for

Subaru XV, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6i 114HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4
Mitsubishi

16 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 114 hp
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV is equipped with petrol which makes by 29 percent more horsepower over the the engine of the Subaru XV, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It should be better car to those who want to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

197 > 150 Nm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III has 31 percent more torque than the Subaru XV. Although a great deal of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it informs the best how fast a car acclerates. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is substantial thus the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV will give you better feeling of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 13.1 s
A small difference at the level of 18 percent shows that the Subaru XV is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „compact SUV segment, being represented by the Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4, the medium acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 20 % higher than this of Subaru vehicle.
33

Top speed

184 > 179 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi is greater in comparison to this of the Subaru XV by 3, which allows the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual to travel faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,799 > 1,779 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV is 1 percent wider when compared to the Subaru XV. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,680 > 2,635 mm
The Mitsubishi has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4. Therefore the Mitsubishi Outlander III is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,601 cc
The Mitsubishi has by 396 cc bigger engine size than the Subaru XV. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 480 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,600 > 1,505 kg
6

Length

4,654 > 4,450 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual is 5 percent longer in relation to the Subaru XV. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi Outlander III occurs to be better for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Subaru may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,525 mm
1

Height

1,682 > 1,616 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, which is by 4 % higher than the Subaru XV, is better option for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,065 > 1,945 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

750 > 653 kg
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,525 mm

Subaru

15 reasons for Subaru XV 1.6i 114KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.7 l
The Subaru consumes 1.4 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. The Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4, which is palced in „compact SUV” segment consumes by 1.2 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

8 > 9.7 l
The Subaru XV uses 18 % less fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. The difference at the level of 1.7 l will be quite big in using vehicle. Additionally, during several years it will generate gigantic cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the longer range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 6.3 l
19

Range

923 > 800 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 59 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Subaru that can carry by 2 l more gasoline than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV.
12

Urban range

750 > 619 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,034 > 952 km
9

Ground clearance

218 > 216 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the car body and the road. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Subaru XV which has 1 percent higher ride height than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. For this reason the Subaru XV will cope better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. However, the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the vehicle.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine placed inside the Subaru occurs to be significantly better because it is smaller and creates less vibrations than engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. Furthermore it is good to know its horizontal configuration results in that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of In-line engine, like the one in the Mitsubishi Outlander III, is that thanks to its simplicity of construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,457 > 1,440 kg

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual Subaru XV 1.6i 114HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,600 kg 1,505 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK