Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org DY5W-sport Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Mitsubishi

20 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 106 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV that has by 41 more horsepower when compared to the Suzuki. Therefore the Mitsubishi Outlander III is able to achieve higher speed. Having more horsepower the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV will also give more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

7.7 > 8.3 l
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual uses 0.6 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Suzuki. The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual, being classified in „compact SUV” class burns up by 0.2 l more of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

197 > 145 Nm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has 52 newton meters more torque when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. Even though a great deal of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is of considerable size hence the Mitsubishi Outlander III will provide you with better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 10.2 l
The Mitsubishi burns up 5 percent fewer in city traffic than the Suzuki. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is not significant in daily use of the vehicle at the same time in a several months it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 14.4 s
A little difference amounts to 3.6 s shows that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is insensibly beaten here. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the Suzuki is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 3.5 s faster than acceleration of Suzuki’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

184 > 160 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual is higher in comparison to this of the Suzuki which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 15 % is little and is not realy noticable in daily use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.3 > 7 l
19

Range

800 > 671 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 55 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is worst that the Mitsubishi Outlander III in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual is able to carry by 4 l more fuel in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV.
15

Wheelbase

2,680 > 2,636 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has 44 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. As a result the Mitsubishi Outlander III is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

619 > 539 km
11

Extra-urban range

952 > 775 km
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,587 cc
The engine displacement of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is by 26 % bigger when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. As a result the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mitsubishi will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 425 kg
6

Length

4,654 > 4,467 mm
The Mitsubishi is 187 mm longer in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Outlander III will be better driven ,however, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2005
Manufacture of the older car commenced 7 years prior to its rival hence it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle features not so advanced technologies used.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,065 > 1,828 kg
0

Rear overhang

1,029 > 1,074 mm
0

Curb weight

1,440 > 1,405 kg

Suzuki

7 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,100 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s performance. Still, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,810 > 1,799 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 is widther only by 11 mm compared with the Mitsubishi Outlander III and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „mini 4x4” class equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 13 mm larger than the same feature of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4.
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,540 mm
1

Height

1,695 > 1,682 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II, which is by 13 mm higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual, is better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

753 > 953 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,600 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK