Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.0 D3 136HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Volvo

22 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.7 l
The Volvo uses 27 percent fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. The difference in the amount of 27 % will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 197 Nm
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual has 78 % more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. Although a large number of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is substantial and for that reason the Volvo XC60 will provide you with better sensation of driving.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 9.7 l
The Volvo burns up 2.8 l fewer fuel in urban cycle compared with the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. The difference at the level of 29 % will be quite significant in use of vehicle. Additionally, during several years it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably lifted if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
33

Top speed

190 > 184 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual is higher in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 6 kilometers/hour is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,250 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine achieves its full efficiency with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.9 > 6.3 l
22

Width

1,889 > 1,799 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Volvo is 5 % wider than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

1,228 > 800 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 59 l
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV loses with the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual is able to take by 19 % more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV.
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,680 mm
The Volvo XC60 has 95 millimeters longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi. As a result the Volvo XC60 SUV is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
12

Urban range

1,014 > 619 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,429 > 952 km
9

Ground clearance

231 > 216 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in several important parameters of a car. It is very important for SUV cars though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual has 7 percent larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
4

Rear track

1,586 > 1,540 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,714 > 1,682 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference of 2 percent in favor of the Volvo is little and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,540 mm
0

Front overhang

911 > 953 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Rear overhang

942 > 1,029 mm

Mitsubishi

7 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

147 > 136 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual which has by 11 horsepower more when compared to the Volvo XC60, which makes this car slightly better in terms of high speed. Because of more horsepower the Mitsubishi should also give somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 11.2 s
The Mitsubishi accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.8 s, which is 4 % quicker in comparison to the Volvo. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a car.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,985 cc
The Mitsubishi Outlander III has by 12 cubic centimeters larger engine size in relation to the Volvo XC60. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both figures does not vary much.
6

Length

4,654 > 4,629 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III is 25 mm longer in comparison to the Volvo. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi Outlander III preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven but the Volvo XC60 SUV will be a little easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2008
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mitsubishi Outlander III may feature more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Turning circle

5.1 > 12.3 m.
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has 7.2 m. lower turning circle compared to the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual. Because the difference is really big, the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV features better maneuverability in tight, city traffic as opposed to the the Volvo XC60 SUV, which is more difficult to fit in small parking space.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,600 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK