The Volvo uses 27 percent fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. The difference in the amount of 27 % will be quite perceptible in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual has 78 % more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. Although a large number of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is substantial and for that reason the Volvo XC60 will provide you with better sensation of driving.
The Volvo burns up 2.8 l fewer fuel in urban cycle compared with the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. The difference at the level of 29 % will be quite significant in use of vehicle. Additionally, during several years it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably lifted if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual is higher in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 6 kilometers/hour is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine achieves its full efficiency with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Volvo is 5 % wider than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV loses with the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual is able to take by 19 % more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV.
The Volvo XC60 has 95 millimeters longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi. As a result the Volvo XC60 SUV is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
Ground clearance is a critical factor in several important parameters of a car. It is very important for SUV cars though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual has 7 percent larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 D3 136HP manual will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference of 2 percent in favor of the Volvo is little and does not matter much.