Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Mytho88 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic

18 reasons for

Toyota Land Cruiser V8, model available from 2008.
It has 4.7 V8 288HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2010.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

1 reason for

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 MIVEC 250HP ic petrol engine produced from 2006.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
Toyota

18 reasons for Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

288 > 250 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic that has by 38 horsepower more in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV, which makes this vehicle somewhat better in terms of high speed. Having more horsepower the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 should as well give a bit better efficiency in specific gears.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 10.8 s
The Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 is relatively slower in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser V8. The difference at the level of 1.6 s is quite little and it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for selecting the better one of these two cars.
22

Width

1,973 > 1,877 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Toyota is 5 % wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

646 > 511 km
19

Fuel tank

94 > 68 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic which can comprise 38 % more fuel than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. The average fuel container capacity in the large SUV segment, from which the Toyota comes from, equals 84 l, whereas in large SUV segment (represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4) it equals 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,858 > 2,546 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Land Cruiser V8 has 12 percent longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi Pajero IV. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Toyota Land Cruiser V8 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 3,827 cc
The Toyota Land Cruiser V8 has 837 cc bigger engine size than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Toyota should accelerate slightly better, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
8

Maximum load capacity

790 > 695 kg
6

Length

4,950 > 4,385 mm
The Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is 13 percent longer in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV. Long cars more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 occurs to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides, the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,635 > 1,557 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is more usable and if you regularly carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 very often look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi may be more appropriate.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2006
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi Pajero IV was unveiled only 2 years before the Toyota, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 might have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,865 > 1,848 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 17 millimeters in favor of the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

3,299 > 2,910 kg
0

Front track

1,638 > 1,560 mm
0

Curb weight

2,515 > 2,217 kg

Mitsubishi

1 reason for Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

13.7 > 14.4 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 uses 5 % less in the combined cycle in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser V8. The difference at the level of 0.7 l is not perceptible. At the same time within some time it can generate a real savings.

Cars specifications

Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,299 kg 2,910 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK