Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Ecogarf Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic

12 reasons for

Opel Monterey II, model available from 1998 to 1999.
It has 3.5 V6 24V 215HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 1999.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Opel

12 reasons for Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

215 > 170 hp
The Opel Monterey II comes with petrol which produce by 26 percent more horsepower over the the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be better option to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

310 > 253 Nm
The Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual has 23 % more torque in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. Although most of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it reflects the best how a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible so you probably will not feel the difference.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.8 > 12.8 s
A small difference that amounts to 1 s shows that the Mitsubishi is the worst vehicle of these two . In the ‚Äělarge 4x4 segment, being represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.5 s and is by 22 % higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
33

Top speed

180 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 5 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,000 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached determines how fast an engine achieves its full performance with growth in revolutions. The lower revolutions or the wider range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt faster.
22

Width

1,748 > 1,695 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Opel is 3 percent wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,760 > 2,725 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Opel Monterey II has 35 mm longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Opel Monterey II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual have a higher speed count compared to the Mitsubishi which means that Opel would achieve faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

3,495 > 2,971 cc
The Opel has by 18 percent greater engine size when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,698 > 4,610 mm
The Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual is 88 millimeters longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Opel Monterey II seems to be better choice for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

1998 > 1996
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Opel Monterey II may feature more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,835 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Opel Monterey II, which is by 7 % higher than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.

Mitsubishi

4 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.5 > 18.6 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I consumes 6 percent fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the Opel Monterey II. The difference at the level of 1.1 l is not significant in daily use of the car at the same time within a several months it would give a substantial cost reduction.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I in spite of having a few disadvantages offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be more relaxed. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,400 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 1999

Cars specifications

Opel Monterey II 3.5 V6 24V 215HP manual Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1998 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,600 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK