Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Porsche Cayenne I, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Porsche

16 reasons for Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

250 > 170 hp
The Porsche Cayenne I has by 80 hp more horsepower than Mitsubishi. The Porsche Cayenne I will be distinctly faster speed up owing to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for the Porsche Cayenne I equipped with stronger engine.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.1 > 12.8 s
The Porsche accelerates to 100k\h by 3.7 s quicker when compared to the Mitsubishi. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
28

Top speed

214 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Porsche is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 22 % is not big and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
20

Width

1,928 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Porsche Cayenne I is 233 millimeters wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
16

Wheelbase

2,848 > 2,725 mm
Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 has 5 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
9

Length

4,782 > 4,610 mm
The Porsche is 4 % longer when compared to the Mitsubishi. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Porsche Cayenne I very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Porsche Cayenne I will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
9

Number of gears

6 > 4 gears
The Porsche Cayenne I have a higher speed count compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I which means that Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 will have better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
4

Engine capacity

3,188 > 2,971 cc
The Porsche Cayenne I has 7 percent greater cubic capacity than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. As the difference is small, the Porsche Cayenne I should accelerate only slightly faster, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
3

Rear track

1,665 > 1,434 mm
2

Model release date

2002 > 1996
Manufacture of the older vehicle started much more earlier than its competitor thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle gives way to Porsche Cayenne I because it has significantly less modern parts .
2

Tire width

255 > 245 mm
2

Price range

sports > popular
0

Front track

1,647 > 1,422 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

2,162 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
54

Urban consumption

17.5 > 17.7 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 consumes 1 percent less petrol running around the town than the Porsche Cayenne I. The Mitsubishi, that represents large SUV segment, uses 2.7 l fewer fuel. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large 4x4 segment equals to 14.8 l, whereas the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I consumes by 18 percent more fuel than the average.
2

Height

1,720 > 1,699 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, which is by 21 millimeters higher than the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4, is appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a ride around town, it is worth to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison can have a substantial effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2006

Cars specifications

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Model release date 2002 1996
    Price range sports popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,941 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK