Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 vs Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Ssangyong Rexton I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 2.3 RX 140HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual
Mitsubishi

11 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 140 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 that has by 21 % horsepower more than the Ssangyong, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Having more horsepower the Mitsubishi will as well provide somewhat more efficiency in specific gears.
33

Top speed

175 > 170 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Ssangyong which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 3 percent is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 2,294 cc
The engine capacity of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is by 677 cc bigger in comparison to the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. In a consequence the Ssangyong Rexton I will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a upgraded version of a straight engine which as far as we are concerned is with more adventages. Engine of V configuration put in a the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and nicer sound is undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 235 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To people who opt for more convenient driving a vehicle and don’t need complications that stems from the stick shift we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic transmission. For those who enjoy sporting driving a manual gearbox may be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,835 > 1,816 kg

Ssangyong

10 reasons for Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

11.9 > 13.5 l
The Ssangyong Rexton I uses 1.6 l less in the combined cycle than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference at the level of 1.6 l is not perceptible. However in the long run it would allow you to make a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

15.8 > 17.5 l
The fuel consumption of the Ssangyong is 10 % better in comparison to the Mitsubishi. Despite the difference is small, in the long term it may cause that the vehicle would be noticably less expensive to run.
22

Width

1,880 > 1,695 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual is widther only by 11 percent than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 and is not really relevant. The average for the „large off-road 4x4” segment amounts to approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 1 percent larger than the same attribute of the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,838 > 2,725 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Ssangyong should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Ssangyong Rexton I have a higher gear count compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 which means that Ssangyong will have better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
6

Length

4,729 > 4,610 mm
The Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual is 119 millimeters longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Ssangyong very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Ssangyong Rexton I will be better driven ,however, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

2002 > 1996
Production of the older vehicle started 6 years prior to its contender thus man may suspect that this vehicle features significantly less modern solutions used.
1

Height

1,770 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Ssangyong, which is by 50 mm higher than the Mitsubishi, is appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Front track

1,550 > 1,422 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,550 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK