Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 vs Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Toyota Highlander I, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 2.4 16V 157HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual
Mitsubishi

12 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 157 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is by 13 horsepowers bigger when compared to the Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual. As the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
33

Top speed

175 > 170 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi is greater in comparison to of the Toyota by 5 km/h, which allows the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,725 > 2,707 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I has 18 mm longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Toyota Highlander I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 2,362 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is by 609 cc larger in comparison to the Toyota Highlander I. As a result the Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded version of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which as far as we are concerned is {a better one. Engine of V configuration inside a vehicle the Mitsubishi produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can house more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission which is installed in the Mitsubishi despite having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be less exhausted. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,835 > 1,577 kg

Toyota

8 reasons for Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

10.7 > 17.5 l
The Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual consumes 39 % fewer gasoline running around the town in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 39 percent is quite noticeable in daily usage of the automobile. What is more, in a long run it will even bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 12.8 s
A little difference that amounts to 2 seconds suggests that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „large SUV segment, being represented by the Mitsubishi, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.5 s and is by 2.3 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
22

Width

1,827 > 1,695 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Toyota Highlander I is widther by 8 percent than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I and is not really relevant. The medium for the „large 4x4 ” segment is around 1,866 mm and is by 2 percent bigger than the same attribute of the Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual.
6

Length

4,688 > 4,610 mm
The Toyota Highlander I is 2 percent longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Toyota Highlander I will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

2001 > 1996
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I started to be manufactured only 5 years prior to the Toyota, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Toyota Highlander I may feature a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,726 > 1,720 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference of 6 mm to the advantage of the Toyota Highlander I is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,580 > 1,422 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 Toyota Highlander I 2.4 16V 157HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 2001
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2008 2007
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK