Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 vs Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Toyota Land Cruiser III, model available from 1996 to 2002.
It has 2.7 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2002.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual
Mitsubishi

13 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 152 hp
The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I which has by 18 horsepower more than the Toyota, which makes this vehicle slightly better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Mitsubishi should as well give slightly more efficiency in specific gears.
56

Urban consumption

17.5 > 18 l
The Mitsubishi consumes 0.5 l fewer fuel while driving inside city in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser III. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, that represents large 4x4 class, consumes 2.7 l fewer gasoline. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the full-size SUV segment equals to 14.8 l, while the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I uses by 18 percent more amount of fuel than the average.
33

Top speed

175 > 165 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Toyota Land Cruiser III which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 10 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,725 > 2,668 mm
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser III. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 2,694 cc
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I has 10 percent bigger engine size than the Toyota. Because the difference is not big, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better construction of a straight engine which in our opinion} is {a better one. Engine of V configuration put in a the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is undoubtedly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 215 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Mitsubishi despite having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is more rested. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2002
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire profile

70 > 80 %
0

Curb weight

1,835 > 1,680 kg

Toyota

10 reasons for Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,825 > 1,695 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The width of the Toyota is larger only by 8 percent in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 and is not really worth considering. The average for the „full-size SUV” class is 1,866 mm and is by 2 % bigger than the width of the Toyota.
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Toyota Land Cruiser III have a higher speed count in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 which means that Toyota Land Cruiser III will achieve better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
6

Length

4,678 > 4,610 mm
The Toyota Land Cruiser III is 68 mm longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Toyota Land Cruiser III seems to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 may appeal to the young because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,507 > 1,434 mm
1

Height

1,880 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Toyota Land Cruiser III, which is by 9 % higher than the Mitsubishi, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Front track

1,506 > 1,422 mm
0

Front overhang

766 > 828 mm
0

Rear overhang

979 > 1,057 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,513 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK