Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Toyota Sequoia I, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 4.7 V8 32V 243HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Toyota

13 reasons for Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

243 > 170 hp
The Toyota Sequoia I has 43 % more horsepower in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The Toyota Sequoia I will be distinctly faster accelerate because of grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also getting ahead of other cars should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
22

Width

2,032 > 1,695 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is larger only by 337 millimeters than the Mitsubishi and is not really important. The medium for the „full-size SUV” segment amounts to 1,866 mm and is by 166 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Toyota Sequoia I.
15

Wheelbase

3,102 > 2,725 mm
The Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual has 14 % longer wheelbase when compared to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Consequently the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 2,971 cc
The Toyota Sequoia I has 1,693 cc larger engine size than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference is considerable. Consequently the Toyota should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater cubic capacity usually means worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

5,209 > 4,610 mm
The Toyota Sequoia I is 599 millimeters longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Toyota Sequoia I probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Toyota Sequoia I will be better driven ,however, the Mitsubishi will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,752 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

2001 > 1996
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi was launched only 5 years before the Toyota Sequoia I, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Toyota Sequoia I might have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,956 > 1,720 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 236 millimeters to the advantage of the Toyota Sequoia I is small and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,726 > 1,422 mm
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Curb weight

2,298 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.5 > 23 l
The Mitsubishi uses 24 % fewer fuel in the city in relation to the Toyota Sequoia I. The difference at the level of 5.5 l is very big in using vehicle. Additionally, within many months it may give real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption may be considerably increased if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift that is placed in the Toyota is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage but also it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to work with the clutch to shift speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a congested city traffic where drivers have lots of frequent stop and go situations. An automatic transmission which is put in the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I with 4 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better one to have.
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007

Cars specifications

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2001 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,945 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK