Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Nissan Pathfinder III, model available from 2004.
It has 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP petrol engine produced from 2004.
Drive has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
Nissan

9 reasons for Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

250 > 178 hp
The Nissan has 40 percent more horsepower in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The Nissan Pathfinder III will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate owing to bigger power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other vehicles while driving should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,090 > 1,813 l
22

Width

1,846 > 1,813 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The Nissan is widther by 2 % in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large SUV” class is 1,866 millimeters and is by 1 percent smaller than the same attribute of the Nissan Pathfinder III.
19

Fuel tank

79 > 69 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank capacity is Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP which is able to hold by 10 l more fuel than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II.
15

Wheelbase

2,859 > 2,806 mm
Nissan Pathfinder III has 2 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

4,740 > 4,695 mm
The Nissan is 45 mm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The length of the car is important in terms of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,567 > 1,513 mm
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,520 mm

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

714 > 190 l
The trunk of the Mitsubishi is 276 % bigger in relation to the Nissan Pathfinder III. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV will be much more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can transport.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2004
Manufacture of the older car started much more earlier than its competitor hence it is reasonable to suppose that this car gives way to Mitsubishi because it has significantly less modern parts applied.
1

Height

1,838 > 1,783 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4, which is by 3 % higher than the Nissan Pathfinder III, is better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.

Cars specifications

Nissan Pathfinder III 4.0 i V6 2WD 250HP Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 2,499 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK