Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

7 reasons for

Ssangyong Rexton II SUV, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 2.7 Xdi 186HP diesel engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
Ssangyong

7 reasons for Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

186 > 178 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Ssangyong Rexton II SUV which has by 8 horsepower more in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, which makes this car slightly better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Ssangyong Rexton II should also provide somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

935 > 714 l
With more trunk space the Ssangyong will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional car than the Mitsubishi. If the size of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP will be better choice as it is around 221 l more spacious than the trunk of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4.
22

Width

1,889 > 1,813 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ssangyong Rexton II is 76 mm wider than the Mitsubishi. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,821 > 2,806 mm
The Ssangyong has 1 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. Therefore the Ssangyong Rexton II is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
6

Length

4,731 > 4,695 mm
The Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP is 36 mm longer in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Ssangyong preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Ssangyong Rexton II will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,513 mm
0

Front track

1,570 > 1,520 mm

Mitsubishi

2 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2012 > 2007
The difference in debut day between these two cars is only 5 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,838 > 1,783 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II, which is by 3 % higher than the Ssangyong Rexton II SUV, is better pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Cars specifications

Ssangyong Rexton II SUV 2.7 Xdi 186HP Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 2,499 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK