Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

Ssangyong Rexton W, model available from 2012.
It has D20DTR 155HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
Ssangyong

13 reasons for Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.5 > 8.4 l
The Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual burns up 0.9 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. The Ssangyong Rexton W, being palced in „large 4x4 ” segment consumes by 4.7 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 12.2 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.4 > 9.8 l
The Ssangyong consumes 0.4 l fewer fuel running around the town than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The Ssangyong, which comes from large 4x4 segment, consumes 5.4 l less oil. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large off-road 4x4 class equals to 14.8 l, while the Ssangyong Rexton W consumes by 37 % less amount of fuel than the average.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 1,995 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is produced determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.3 > 7.3 l
22

Width

1,900 > 1,813 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ssangyong Rexton W is 87 millimeters wider in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,836 > 2,806 mm
Ssangyong Rexton W has 30 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
9

Ground clearance

251 > 217 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important characteristics of a car. Clearance is the most important in SUV vehicles still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Ssangyong Rexton W has 34 millimeters higher clearance when compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large kerbstones, for example.
8

Maximum load capacity

749 > 665 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

2,597 > 2,499 kg
6

Length

4,755 > 4,695 mm
The Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual is 1 percent longer when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4. Long cars are more spacious and also have bigger trunk. Although the Ssangyong Rexton W occurs to be better option for families or those who love the idea of convenient driving, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II may be more appropriate to singles as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,513 mm
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,520 mm
0

Rear overhang

1,036 > 1,101 mm

Mitsubishi

7 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

178 > 155 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV is by 23 hp grater when compared to the Ssangyong Rexton W. Because the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
59

Maximal torque

398 > 358 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 is 40 newton meters bigger than the Ssangyong Rexton W. For this reason, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will accelerate slightly faster and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II will burn up on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
33

Top speed

179 > 173 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi is higher in comparison to this of the Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 3 % is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.
8

Engine capacity

2,476 > 1,997 cc
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 has by 24 % greater engine displacement than the Ssangyong Rexton W. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
0

Payload

2,708 > 2,645 kg
0

Front overhang

797 > 885 mm
0

Curb weight

2,047 > 1,898 kg

Cars specifications

Ssangyong Rexton W D20DTR 155HP manual Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 2,597 kg 2,499 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Code name W -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK