Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org Mytho88 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic

16 reasons for

Toyota Land Cruiser V8, model available from 2008.
It has 4.7 V8 288HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2010.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.5 DI-D 178HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
Toyota

16 reasons for Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

288 > 178 hp
The Toyota has by 110 horsepowers more horsepower compared to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The Toyota Land Cruiser V8 will be distinctly better accelerate owing to bigger power. Also getting ahead of other vehicles while moving along the road should be much more easier for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 11.7 s
A little difference amounts to 21 % indicates that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV is insignificantly beaten here. In the „large off-road 4x4” segment, to which the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 is assigned, the medium acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 11 % faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
33

Top speed

200 > 179 km/h
The top speed of the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic is higher as compared to this of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 12 percent is little and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,973 > 1,813 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is widther only by 9 percent compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II and is not really worth considering. The average for the „full-size SUV” segment is 1,866 mm and is by 6 % smaller than the width of the Toyota Land Cruiser V8.
19

Fuel tank

94 > 69 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Toyota which can hold 36 percent more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. The medium fuel tank size in the full-size SUV segment, which is represented by the Toyota Land Cruiser V8, equals 84 liters, whereas in large SUV class (represented by the Mitsubishi) it amounts to 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,858 > 2,806 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic has 52 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Toyota should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 2,476 cc
The Toyota has 88 % larger engine size than the Mitsubishi. The difference is relatively big. As a result the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

790 > 665 kg
6

Length

4,950 > 4,695 mm
The Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is 5 % longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Toyota very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Toyota will be better driven but the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,635 > 1,513 mm
1

Height

1,865 > 1,838 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 percent to the advantage of the Toyota is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission which is installed in the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 in spite of having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be less exhausted. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Payload

3,299 > 2,708 kg
0

Front track

1,638 > 1,520 mm
0

Curb weight

2,515 > 2,047 kg

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.4 > 14.4 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4 burns up 42 percent fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Toyota. The difference at the level of 6 liters will be quite realy noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a substantial cost reduction.
19

Range

854 > 646 km
1

Model release date

2012 > 2008
Because of the fact that the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic's production started only 4 years earlier than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II may feature a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.

Cars specifications

Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero Sport II SUV 2.5 DI-D 178HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 2,499 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK