Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual vs Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual

Source: similarcar.com All rights reserved

18 reasons for

Nissan 370Z Coupe, model available from 2009.
It has 3.7 V6 328HP petrol engine produced from 2009.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

15 reasons for

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio, model available from 2007.
It has 2.5 T5 230HP ic petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic
Nissan

18 reasons for Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328KM manual in comparison to Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

328 > 230 hp
The Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual has by 43 % more horsepower in comparison to Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic. The Nissan will be distinctly quicker accelerate owing to bigger power. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

363 > 320 Nm
Maximum torque of the Nissan 370Z is 13 % bigger than the Volvo C70 II. Because of this, the Nissan 370Z will accelerate somewhat faster and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Nissan 370Z Coupe will use less fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

5.3 > 8 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the Nissan 370Z fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 2.7 s faster compared to the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
33

Top speed

250 > 235 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan 370Z is greater than this of the Volvo C70 II by 6, which allows the Nissan 370Z Coupe to travel faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 6 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,850 > 1,836 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Nissan is 14 millimeters wider than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

679 > 638 km
19

Fuel tank

71 > 60 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual which can contain 11 liters more fuel than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. The medium fuel container capacity in the S segment, which is represented by the Nissan, equals 68 liters, whereas in sports cars segment (represented by the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio) it is 68 liters.
14

Cylinders

6 > 5
12

Urban range

468 > 429 km
11

Extra-urban range

923 > 896 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan 370Z has only one extra gear than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. Generally the extra speed is a taller one thanks to which the previous speeds can be shorter to allow increased acceleration in the lower speeds. One more speed also will contribute to smaller fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

3,697 > 2,522 cc
The Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual has 1,175 cc larger cubic capacity in comparison to the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic. The difference is big. As a result the Nissan 370Z Coupe should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually affects worst fuel consumption.
4

Rear track

1,595 > 1,560 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a developed version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which as far as we are concerned is with more adventages. Engine of V characteristic put inside a vehicle the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2009 > 2007
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Nissan 370Z may feature more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Tire width

245 > 235 mm
0

Valves

24 > 20
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″

Volvo

15 reasons for Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230KM automat in comparison to Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.3 > 10.6 l
The Volvo uses 1.3 l fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual. The difference in the amount of 12 % is not significant. However in the long term it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

14 > 15.4 l
The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic burns up 1.4 l fewer fuel running around the town in comparison to the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual. The Volvo, that comes from sports cars segment, consumes 0.5 l less gasoline. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the sports cars segment equals to 13.5 l, whereas the Volvo needs by 4 % more amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

403 > 235 l
The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic has 168 l bigger boot in relation to the Nissan 370Z Coupe. Such a difference is relevant so it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Volvo C70 II has 133 l bigger boot size than the average in its segment. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also while daily car’s usage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 5,205 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Volvo. The engine of the Nissan achieves its full efficiency at 5,205 revolutions per minute which is by 3,705 revolutions per minute lower than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.7 > 7.6 l
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,545 mm
Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic has 99 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Nissan 370Z Coupe. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Maximum load capacity

380 > 329 kg
6

Length

4,615 > 4,250 mm
The Volvo is 9 percent longer in relation to the Nissan 370Z. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. While the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides, the Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,401 > 1,314 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 87 millimeters to the advantage of the Volvo is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a smooth drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel economy. Automatics may use around from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 7,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,102 > 1,800 kg
0

Front track

1,550 > 1,547 mm
0

Curb weight

1,718 > 1,469 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan 370Z Coupe 3.7 V6 328HP manual Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2009 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,800 kg 2,102 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK