Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual vs Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual

Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

17 reasons for

Nissan Almera II Hatchback, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 1.5 16V 98HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Opel Astra G Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2009.
It has 1.4 16V 90HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual
Nissan

17 reasons for Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98KM manual in comparison to Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

98 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Nissan that has by 9 % horsepower more when compared to the Opel Astra G, which makes this vehicle somewhat better in terms of high speed. Having more horsepower the Nissan should also give a bit better efficiency in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 6.9 l
The Nissan Almera II Hatchback burns up 0.3 l less in the combined cycle than the Opel Astra G. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not very appreciable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

8.6 > 9.3 l
The Nissan Almera II burns up 0.7 l fewer petrol in city traffic than the Opel Astra G Hatchback. The Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual, that represents small family cars segment, burns up 0.1 l fewer fuel. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small family cars segment equals to 8.7 l, while the Nissan Almera II uses by 1 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
33

Top speed

185 > 180 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual is greater than of the Opel by 5 km/h, which allows the Nissan Almera II to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 % is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
19

Range

909 > 754 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 52 l
The Opel Astra G Hatchback is worst that the Nissan Almera II Hatchback in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Nissan is able to store by 13 % more fuel in relation to its contender.
12

Urban range

698 > 553 km
8

Engine capacity

1,498 > 1,390 cc
The Nissan Almera II Hatchback has 8 percent greater engine size than the Opel Astra G. Because the difference is small, the Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual should accelerate only slightly faster, of course if other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

540 > 457 kg
6

Length

4,184 > 4,108 mm
The Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual is 2 percent longer when compared to the Opel. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Nissan Almera II seems to be better option for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Opel Astra G may appeal to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

2000 > 1998
Given that the Opel's production started only 2 years before the Nissan Almera II, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Nissan might have a bit more modern solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,448 > 1,425 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Nissan, which is by 23 millimeters higher than the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual, is appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

185 > 175 mm
0

Payload

1,708 > 1,624 kg
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,170 > 1,163 kg

Opel

8 reasons for Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 13.1 s
A small difference that amounts to 5 % shows that the Nissan is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „lower middle class, being represented by the Nissan Almera II, the medium acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 16 percent higher than this of Nissan car.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 355 l
If you need a vehicles for long journeys, which could room more things in the boot , choose the Opel Astra G. The Nissan Almera II Hatchback is equiped with by 15 liters less capable luggage compartment than the Nissan Almera II Hatchback so probably you would be able to put in the trunk one bag less. When it comes to the trunk also check its width length and height which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,142 > 1,020 l
22

Width

1,705 > 1,703 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Opel Astra G is widther by 2 mm in relation to the Nissan Almera II Hatchback and is not really relevant. The average for the „C” class amounts to approximately 1,703 mm and is by 2 millimeters larger than the width of the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,604 > 2,538 mm
The Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual has 66 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan. Consequently the Opel Astra G Hatchback is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
4

Rear track

1,470 > 1,458 mm
0

Front track

1,485 > 1,470 mm
0

End of model sale

2009 > 2006

Cars specifications

Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - G
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK