Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual vs Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual

Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

10 reasons for

Nissan Almera II Hatchback, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 1.5 16V 98HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Opel Astra G Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2009.
It has 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual
Nissan

10 reasons for Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98KM manual in comparison to Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

98 > 90 hp
The horsepower of the Nissan Almera II Hatchback is 8 horsepowers bigger when compared to the Opel Astra G. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.1 > 13.6 s
The Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual is relatively slower in relation to the Nissan Almera II Hatchback. The difference in the amount of 0.5 s is is slightly to the Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual advantage, however, it should not be substantially taken into account for choosing one of presented vehicles.
33

Top speed

185 > 182 km/h
The top velocity of the Nissan is greater as compared to this of the Opel Astra G Hatchback which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 3 kilometers per hour is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
19

Range

909 > 867 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 52 l
In this category it is the Nissan Almera II Hatchback that can hold 13 % more fuel in relation to the Opel. The average fuel container capacity in the small family cars class, which is represented by the Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual, equals 52 l, whereas in compact segment (represented by the Opel Astra G Hatchback) it amounts to 52 l.
12

Urban range

698 > 658 km
8

Engine capacity

1,498 > 1,365 cc
The Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual has 10 % greater engine capacity in relation to the Opel. Because the difference is not big, the Nissan should accelerate a bit better, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,184 > 4,108 mm
The Nissan Almera II is 2 percent longer when compared to the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan Almera II preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Nissan Almera II Hatchback will be better driven ,however, the Opel will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2000 > 1998
Because of the fact that the Opel Astra G debuted only 2 years earlier than the Nissan, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Nissan Almera II Hatchback may feature slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,448 > 1,425 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Nissan, which is by 23 millimeters higher than the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Opel

9 reasons for Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90KM manual in comparison to Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6 > 6.6 l
The Opel Astra G Hatchback consumes 9 percent less in the mixed cycle than the Nissan. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

7.8 > 8.6 l
The Opel burns 0.8 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Nissan. The difference at the level of 9 percent is quite big in everyday use of vehicle. Additionally, during years it will generate huge savings. Also you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably increased if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 355 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for cruises, which could room more things in the boot , decide to buy the Opel Astra G. The Nissan has by 15 l smaller luggage compartment compared with the Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual so you would be able to carry a bit less. Assessing the trunk pay attention to its width length and height which have appreciable effect on loading possibility .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,142 > 1,020 l
22

Width

1,705 > 1,703 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Opel Astra G Hatchback is 2 mm wider than the Nissan. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,604 > 2,538 mm
The Opel Astra G Hatchback has 66 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan. Consequently the Opel Astra G is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
4

Rear track

1,470 > 1,458 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,485 > 1,470 mm

Cars specifications

Nissan Almera II Hatchback 1.5 16V 98HP manual Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 Twinport ECOTEC 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - G
    Class C C

Most popular cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK