Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 vs Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org ppmfl Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

23 reasons for

Nissan GT-R Coupe, model available from 2007.
It has 3.8 285HP ic petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio, model available from 2007.
It has 2.5 T5 230HP ic petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic
Nissan

23 reasons for Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

285 > 230 hp
The horsepower of the Nissan GT-R Coupe is 24 percent grater in relation to the Volvo. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
59

Maximal torque

588 > 320 Nm
The Nissan GT-R has 84 percent more torque when compared to the Volvo. Although a great deal of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when choosing a car, it reflects the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is relevant hence the Nissan GT-R will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

3.5 > 8 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 fits you better because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 56 % better than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic.
33

Top speed

311 > 235 km/h
The Volvo C70 II has 32 percent lower maximum speed in relation to the Nissan GT-R, consequently passing a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference may be perceptible during running over fast and long routes to the car of Nissan brand advantage.
22

Width

1,895 > 1,836 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Nissan is 59 millimeters wider in relation to the Volvo. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

718 > 638 km
19

Fuel tank

73 > 60 l
In this category it is the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 which can comprise 22 % more fuel than the Volvo. The average fuel tank capacity in the sports cars class, which is represented by the Nissan GT-R, amounts to 68 liters, whereas in sports cars segment (represented by the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio) it amounts to 68 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,770 > 2,644 mm
The Nissan GT-R has 5 % longer wheelbase when compared to Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic. Consequently the Nissan GT-R is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

6 > 5
12

Urban range

484 > 429 km
11

Extra-urban range

974 > 896 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan have a higher gear count than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio which means that Nissan GT-R should achieve better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
8

Engine capacity

3,800 > 2,522 cc
The Nissan GT-R has 51 % greater engine displacement in comparison to the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. The difference is substantia. As a result the Nissan should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity equals worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,670 > 4,615 mm
The Nissan GT-R Coupe is 1 % longer than the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Nissan GT-R Coupe very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Volvo will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,599 > 1,560 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a upgraded version of a straight engine which according to us is {a better one. Engine of V configuration in a car the Nissan GT-R Coupe gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 has an extra door at the back of a car. It will allow him to put stuff into a boot in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of big size. Passages of both cars who are to travel in the back have to enter a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
1

Tire width

255 > 235 mm
0

Front track

1,590 > 1,550 mm
0

Valves

24 > 20
0

Tire diameter

20 > 17 ″
0

Tire profile

40 > 45 %
0

Curb weight

1,744 > 1,718 kg

Volvo

11 reasons for Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230KM automat in comparison to Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.3 > 10.3 l
The Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio burns up 10 % less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4. The Volvo C70 II, which is palced in „sports cars” segment consumes by 0.4 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 9.7 l.
56

Urban consumption

14 > 15.3 l
The Volvo C70 II uses 1.3 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Nissan GT-R Coupe. The difference at the level of 1.3 l will be quite big in daily use of car. Additionally, within long period of time it will generate gigantic cost savings. Also keep in mind that estimated results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

403 > 315 l
With more luggage capacity the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio will have much more room for loading things and be more functional one compared with the Nissan. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic will be better to choose because it is about 88 l more spacious than the boot of the Nissan.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 3,205 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio. The engine of the Nissan GT-R reaches its full efficiency at 3,205 revolutions/minute which is by 1,705 revolutions per minute worst result than the Volvo C70 II.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.7 > 7.4 l
8

Maximum load capacity

380 > 220 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,401 > 1,372 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio, which is by 2 % higher than the Nissan, is appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,400 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,562 > 1,471 mm
0

Payload

2,102 > 1,958 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan GT-R Coupe 3.8 285HP automatic 4x4 Volvo C70 II Coupe Cabrio 2.5 T5 230HP automatic
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2007 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,958 kg 2,102 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK