Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual vs Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kārlis Dambrāns Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

12 reasons for

Nissan Juke, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 DIG-T 190HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Subaru Forester II, model available from 2002 to 2008.
It has 2.0 X 125HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
Nissan

12 reasons for Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

190 > 125 hp
The Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual is equipped with petrol which makes by 52 % more horsepower than the Subaru, giving the vehicle a much more dynamic character. It seems to be googd option to those who want to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
112

Average consumption

6.9 > 8.3 l
The Nissan Juke uses 17 % less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4. The Nissan Juke, which is classified in „mini 4x4” class consumes by 0.6 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.1 > 11.6 l
The Nissan Juke uses 22 percent fewer fuel in urban cycle compared with the Subaru Forester II. The difference at the level of 2.5 l is quite big in everyday use of car. Additionally, during long period of time it will give huge savings. Moreover keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably lifted if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8 > 11.4 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are keen on, the Nissan Juke fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 3.4 s faster compared to the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4.
33

Top speed

215 > 180 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual is greater in relation to of the Subaru Forester II by 19, which allows the Nissan Juke to cover quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 19 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,765 > 1,735 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Nissan is 30 mm wider in comparison to the Subaru Forester II. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual has a one extra gear compared to the Subaru Forester II. Sometimes the additional speed is a very tall one so that the previous speeds can be narrower in order to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed as well will result in smaller fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
4

Rear track

1,512 > 1,485 mm
1

Model release date

2010 > 2002
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than Subaru Forester II thus man may suspect that this car gives way to Nissan Juke because it has not so advanced solutions used.
0

Front track

1,525 > 1,495 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 70 %

Subaru

10 reasons for Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

406 > 250 l
The Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 has 156 l more capable boot in comparison to the Nissan Juke. Such a difference is quite relevant so it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 has 39 l bigger boot size than the average in its class. Larger luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys as well as while everyday car’s usage.
19

Range

706 > 667 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 45 l
The Nissan Juke is worst that the Subaru Forester II in the field of fuel tank size. The Subaru Forester II is able to store by 36 % more fuel in relation to its competitor.
12

Urban range

517 > 505 km
9

Ground clearance

199 > 164 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the car body and the ground. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Subaru Forester II that has 35 mm higher ride height when compared with the Nissan Juke. This is why the Subaru Forester II will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Subaru.
8

Engine capacity

1,995 > 1,619 cc
The Subaru has 23 percent larger cubic capacity in comparison to the Nissan Juke. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 should accelerate a bit faster, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,484 > 4,135 mm
The Subaru Forester II is 8 % longer than the Nissan Juke. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Subaru Forester II occurs to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Nissan Juke may appeal to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine placed in the Subaru is noticeably better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations in comparison to straight engine. Additionally you should keep in mind that its horizontally opposed design results in that a automobile has a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one put inside the Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual, is that due to its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
1

Height

1,590 > 1,567 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4, which is by 1 percent higher than the Nissan Juke, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Curb weight

1,360 > 1,289 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 190HP manual Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK