Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual vs Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual

Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

20 reasons for

Nissan Micra III Cabrio, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 1.4 i 16V 88HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Suzuki Swift II Cabrio, model available from 1989 to 1996.
It has 1.0 i 56HP petrol engine produced from 1989 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual
Nissan

20 reasons for Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

88 > 56 hp
The Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual has by 57 % more horsepower in comparison to Suzuki Swift II. The Nissan will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger power. Also getting ahead of other cars while moving along the road should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger engine.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.9 > 15.9 s
The Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual accelerates to 100k\h by 25 percent better in relation to the Suzuki Swift II. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 215 l
With more trunk space the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual will have much more room for transporting things and be more usefull one compared with the Suzuki Swift II. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual will be better choice because it is around 155 l larger than the boot of the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio.
33

Top speed

172 > 145 km/h
The top velocity of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual is greater in comparison to this of the Suzuki which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 19 percent is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,663 > 1,590 mm
Width of a vehicle affects interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Nissan is widther only by 5 percent compared with the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „supermini” class is 1,645 mm and is by 1 % larger than the width of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

45 > 40 l
The Suzuki is worst that the Nissan in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Nissan Micra III is able to carry by 13 percent more fuel compared with the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio.
15

Wheelbase

2,428 > 2,259 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Nissan Micra III has 7 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Suzuki Swift II Cabrio. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,387 > 994 cc
The engine displacement of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio is by 393 cc bigger in comparison to the Suzuki Swift II. In a consequence the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and practical car is 5-door Nissan. The two-door version of Suzuki has less pluses, except for more attractive silhouette.
1

Height

1,525 > 1,350 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 175 millimeters in favor of the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Model release date

2003 > 1989
1

Tire width

175 > 155 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2010 > 1996
0

Valves

16 > 6
0

Tire diameter

15 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 70 %

Suzuki

3 reasons for Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56KM manual in comparison to Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.4 > 6.3 l
The Suzuki uses 14 percent less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Nissan. The Suzuki Swift II Cabrio, which is classified in „subcompact” class uses by 0.6 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6 l.
19

Range

755 > 730 km
6

Length

3,745 > 3,715 mm
The Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual is 1 percent longer when compared to the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual. Long cars have roomy cabin and also provide more storage space. While the Suzuki occurs to be better for families or those who value convenient driving, the Nissan Micra III may appeal to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.

Cars specifications

Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1989
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,480 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK