Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual vs Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan, model available from 2010.
It has 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Nissan Note II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 80HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual
Opel

21 reasons for Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120KM manual in comparison to Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

120 > 80 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual which has by 40 more horsepower in relation to the Nissan Note II. Therefore the Opel can reach higher velocity. With more horsepower the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual will as well provide noticeably better flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

175 > 110 Nm
Because of 65 newton meters greater torque, the engine of the Opel distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Nissan. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 13.7 s
The Nissan Note II accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual. The difference at the level of 16 % is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken by you into as important when buying one of presented vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

397 > 293 l
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual features 104 liters bigger boot in relation to the Nissan. Such a difference is quite relevant and it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Opel Meriva II has 34 % bigger boot capacity than the average in its class. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family journeys as well as during everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

188 > 168 km/h
The top speed of the Opel is higher as compared to this of the Nissan Note II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 20 km/h is little and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Opel. The engine of the Nissan reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 56 percent lower than the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual.
22

Width

1,912 > 1,694 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The width of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual is larger only by 218 millimeters in relation to the Nissan Note II and is not really important. The average for the „microvan” segment is around 1,748 millimeters and is by 164 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Opel Meriva II.
19

Fuel tank

54 > 40 l
The Nissan Note II gives way to the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual is able to hold by 35 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,608 mm
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual has 1 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Nissan Note II. Consequently the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
11

Extra-urban range

1,080 > 1,000 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Opel Meriva II has only one more speed compared to the Nissan Note II. Usually the additional speed is used as an overdrive so that the previous speeds can be narrower in order to give increased performance in the lower speeds. One more gear as well will result in smaller fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

1,687 > 1,199 cc
The engine size of the Opel Meriva II is by 488 cubic centimeters greater in relation to the Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual. For this reason the Nissan will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Opel will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,290 > 4,100 mm
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan is 5 percent longer in relation to the Nissan Note II. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Opel Meriva II will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,616 > 1,530 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 6 % in favor of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual is not big and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

60 > 50 kg
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Nissan

7 reasons for Nissan Note II 1.2 80KM manual in comparison to Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 6.2 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Note II's advantage. This automobile burns 24 percent less fuel in the combined cycle than the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the microvan class, in which the Nissan is classified, equals to 6.1 l while the Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual needs by 22 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

5.7 > 8.2 l
The Nissan Note II burns 2.5 l fewer fuel in urban cycle than the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan. The difference at the level of 31 percent will be very big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, within many months it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,981 > 1,498 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 5.2 l
19

Range

872 > 871 km
12

Urban range

719 > 651 km
1

Model release date

2013 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual's production began only 3 years earlier than the Nissan Note II, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual may have a bit more advanced solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual Nissan Note II 1.2 80HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class microvan microvan
    Payload - 1,510 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK