Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Opel Antara SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4
Nissan

15 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 9.6 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual's advantage. This car uses 42 % less petrol in the combined cycle when compared with the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II uses by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 13.2 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns 48 % fewer fuel in urban cycle in relation to the Opel. The difference at the level of 48 % is quite significant in everyday use of car. Additionally, during several years it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably increased if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 11.9 s
The Opel Antara SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower than the Nissan. The difference at the level of 5 percent is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken into consideration when buying one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 422 l
The trunk of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is only 16 liters bigger than the Opel Antara. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
33

Top speed

183 > 175 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan Qashqai II is greater in comparison to of the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 by 8 kilometers per hour, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is delivered determines how fast an engine reaches its full efficiency with increase in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7.5 l
19

Range

982 > 677 km
12

Urban range

797 > 489 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 890 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II have a higher gear count compared to the Opel which means that Nissan Qashqai II will achieve faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2006
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than its competitor thus it seems to be right to assume that this car has significantly less modern parts used.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,560 mm
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Opel

12 reasons for Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 which has by 25 horsepower more when compared to the Nissan, which makes this vehicle slightly faster. Due to more horsepower the Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 will as well give somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

220 > 190 Nm
The Opel has 16 % more torque than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Although the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it describes the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
22

Width

1,850 > 1,800 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Opel Antara is 3 percent wider in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

65 > 54 l
The Nissan loses with the Opel in the category of fuel tank size. The Opel Antara is able to hold by 20 % more fuel in relation to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,713 > 2,644 mm
Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 has 3 % longer wheelbase than the Nissan Qashqai II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

2,406 > 1,198 cc
The engine displacement of the Nissan is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 1,208 cc in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, that it not reallu have a sense to make the decision which car you should buy. These cars are so dissimilar that on the ground of information about engine displacement we can only choose between car’s performance and vehicle’s economy.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,495 > 1,199 kg
6

Length

4,570 > 4,380 mm
The Opel Antara is 4 percent longer in relation to the Nissan. Long cars more of passenger space and also have bigger trunk. While the Opel Antara seems to be better option for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Nissan Qashqai II may appeal to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,563 mm
1

Height

1,704 > 1,590 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 114 millimeters to the advantage of the Opel Antara is small and does not matter much.
0

Maximal roof load

100 > 75 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 679 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg 1,495 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK