The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Renault Koleos SUV which has by 48 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Therefore the Renault Koleos SUV is able to reach higher maximum speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Renault should also provide better flexiblility in specific speeds.
Maximum torque of the Renault Koleos SUV 2.5 16v 170HP manual is 19 % higher than the Nissan Qashqai II. As a result, the Renault will accelerate somewhat faster and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Renault Koleos SUV will consume on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference at the level of 2.3 s indicates that the Nissan Qashqai II is the worst car of these two presented. In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Nissan, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 4 percent higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
If you need a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could carry more luggage , pick the Renault Koleos SUV 2.5 16v 170HP manual. The Nissan Qashqai II is equiped with by 3 percent less capable trunk in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual so probably you would be able to carry a bit less. Assessing the boot also pay attention to its width length and height which have considerable effect on loading possibility .
The top speed of the Renault Koleos is higher in comparison to this of the Nissan Qashqai II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 12 kilometers/hour is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
Width of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Renault is widther by 52 mm than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to 1,797 mm and is by 3 percent larger than the width of the Renault Koleos.
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Renault Koleos that can carry 12 liters more fuel in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The medium fuel container capacity in the mini 4x4 class, which is represented by the Renault Koleos SUV 2.5 16v 170HP manual, is 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual) it is 61 l.
The Renault Koleos SUV has 1 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Therefore the Renault is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
The engine cubic capacity of the Nissan Qashqai II is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 1,291 cc when compared to the Nissan, that it not reallu have a sense to take the decision which one is better choice. These cars are so unalike that on the basis of information of engine size we can only choose between car’s performance and vehicle’s economy.
The Renault Koleos is 3 percent longer in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Renault Koleos occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Nissan Qashqai II may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Renault Koleos SUV, which is by 105 mm higher than the Nissan, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.