The horsepower of the Nissan Qashqai II is by 10 % bigger in relation to the Skoda Yeti. While the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance largely.
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 0.7 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Skoda Yeti Minivan 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. The Nissan Qashqai II, being palced in „mini 4x4” class burns up by 1.9 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
The Nissan has 16 Nm more torque in comparison to the Skoda. Although the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.
The Nissan uses of 0.7 l petrol less in city traffic compared to the Skoda Yeti Minivan. The Nissan Qashqai II, as a representative of mini 4x4 class, burns up of 2.7 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Skoda Yeti is relatively slower compared with the Nissan. The
difference in the amount of
0.5 s is
quite little and it should
not be strongly taken by you into
consideration when selecting the better one of these two
The boot of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is only 5 % bigger than the Skoda Yeti. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
The top speed possible to be reached by the Nissan Qashqai II is greater in comparison to the Skoda by 5, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual to overcome quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 8 kilometers per hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
Width of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Nissan is widther by 7 mm in relation to the Skoda and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to around 1,797 mm and is by 3 millimeters larger than the width of the Nissan.
Nissan Qashqai II has 66 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the Skoda Yeti Minivan 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The Nissan Qashqai II is 158 millimeters longer when compared to the Skoda Yeti. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Skoda Yeti Minivan 1.2 TSI 105HP manual will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Skoda Yeti was launched only 5 years before the Nissan Qashqai II, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Nissan Qashqai II may have slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.