Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

17 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Subaru Forester II, model available from 2002 to 2008.
It has 2.0 X 125HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
Nissan

17 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.3 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 33 percent less fuel in the combined cycle than the Subaru Forester II. The difference in the amount of 33 % will be very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will result in a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 11.6 l
The Nissan Qashqai II uses 4.7 l of fuel fewer running around the town than the Subaru. The Nissan Qashqai II, that comes from mini 4x4 class, burns up 2.7 l less petrol, which is by 28 % better fuel consumption in comparison to the average in its segment. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is really significant, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should pick up models with similar characteristics.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 11.4 s
The Nissan can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11.3 s, which is 0.1 s faster in comparison to the Subaru. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a ride.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 406 l
The boot of the Nissan Qashqai II is only 32 l bigger than the Subaru Forester II. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same boot space.
33

Top speed

183 > 180 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan is greater in relation to of the Subaru Forester II by 2, which allows the Nissan to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,800 > 1,735 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Nissan Qashqai II is 65 millimeters wider in comparison to the Subaru. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

982 > 706 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,534 mm
The Nissan has 110 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4. Thanks to this the Nissan Qashqai II is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

797 > 517 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II have a higher gear count than the Subaru Forester II which means that Nissan should have faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,485 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2002
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than its competitor and for this reason we may expect that this vehicle has not so modern solutions used.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,495 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Subaru

6 reasons for Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

125 > 115 hp
The horsepower of the Subaru is 9 percent bigger than the Nissan Qashqai II. As the difference is small it should not affect the car performance extensively.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 54 l
The Nissan loses with the Subaru Forester II in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Subaru is able to hold by 7 liters more fuel in comparison to its rival.
8

Engine capacity

1,995 > 1,198 cc
The engine capacity of the Subaru is by 67 % larger in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Subaru Forester II will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,484 > 4,380 mm
The Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 is 2 % longer in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually have plenty of trunk space. Although the Subaru seems to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Nissan Qashqai II may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine installed in the Subaru is noticeably better because it can be shorter and lighter and creates less vibrations than straight engine. Moreover it is worth knowing that its horizontally opposed layout results in that a car has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of In-line engine, like the one in the Nissan Qashqai II, is that because of its simplicity of construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
0

Curb weight

1,360 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK