Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

18 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

14 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Subaru

18 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Subaru, which has by 125 more horsepower in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, which makes this vehicle a great deal faster. Due to more horsepower the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 should as well provide considerably better flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 190 Nm
Thanks to 160 newton meters higher torque, the engine of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Nissan Qashqai II. This, in turn, produces better acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 11.3 s
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 speeds up to 100k\h 34 % quicker than the Nissan Qashqai II. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 438 l
The trunk of the Subaru Forester IV is only 15 percent bigger than the Nissan Qashqai II. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot space.
33

Top speed

221 > 183 km/h
The top velocity of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Nissan Qashqai II which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 21 percent is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 54 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 which is able to take by 13 % more gasoline in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,198 cc
The Subaru has 801 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Subaru Forester IV should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size means worst fuel efficiency.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,996 > 1,199 kg
6

Length

4,596 > 4,380 mm
The Subaru Forester IV is 5 percent longer when compared to the Nissan. The length of the car is important in respect of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Subaru preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Qashqai II will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine put inside the Subaru Forester IV occurs to be significantly better because it can be shorter and lighter and generates less vibrations in comparison to straight engine. Moreover it is good to know that its flat configuration results in that a automobile has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one installed in the Nissan, is that thanks to its simplicity of construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle ride around town, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison can have a considerable impact on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal roof load

80 > 75 kg
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 679 kg
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

14 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual's advantage. This automobile burns 33 % fewer petrol in the mixed cycle compared to the Subaru Forester IV. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual consumes by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 11.2 l
The Nissan burns up 38 % less gasoline in the city when compared to the Subaru Forester IV. The difference in the amount of 4.3 l is quite noticeable in daily usage of the ride. What is more, in a long run it will even give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on how dynamic you drive
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is produced shows us how fast an engine achieves its best performance with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the longer range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7 l
22

Width

1,800 > 1,795 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 5 mm wider than the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

982 > 706 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,634 mm
Nissan Qashqai II has 10 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Subaru Forester IV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

797 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 857 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 497 kg
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,547 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2013
Given that the Subaru Forester IV was launched only 1 year earlier than the Nissan, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Nissan might have slightly more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,545 mm

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK