Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

20 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Nissan

20 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

115 > 106 hp
The horsepower of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 9 hp grater than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. While the difference is little this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II's advantage. This vehicle burns 2.7 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, is 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual burns up by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

190 > 145 Nm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 45 newton meters more torque when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. The difference at this level is relevant, so that the Nissan will be seeding up perceptibly better.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 10.2 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual consumes 32 % of fuel less in city traffic compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, that comes from small off-road 4x4 class, burns up 2.7 l less gasoline, which is by 28 % better fuel consumption than the average in the same class. The difference in fuel economy between compared vehicles is quite significant, so note that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should select models of similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 14.4 s
The Nissan can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11.3 s, which is 3.1 s in comparison to the Suzuki. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 186 l
The boot of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 135 percent more spacious in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Nissan Qashqai II will be much more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
33

Top speed

183 > 160 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Nissan Qashqai II is greater in comparison to of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II by 23 kilometers/hour, which allows the Nissan to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 14 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Nissan Qashqai II. The engine of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV reaches its full efficiency at 4,100 revolutions per minute which is by 51 percent lower than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7 l
19

Range

982 > 671 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,636 mm
Nissan Qashqai II has 8 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

797 > 539 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 775 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan have a higher gear count compared with the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV which means that Nissan Qashqai II will achieve faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not notice the difference.
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 425 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2005
Production of the older vehicle started much more earlier than its competitor and for this reason we may expect that this car is equipped with not so modern technologies applied.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,860 > 1,828 kg
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,540 mm
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Suzuki

8 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,810 > 1,800 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II is 10 millimeters wider when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

55 > 54 l
The Nissan Qashqai II gives way to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II is able to carry by 2 % more fuel in relation to its rival.
8

Engine capacity

1,587 > 1,198 cc
The Suzuki has 32 % greater engine size when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is big. As a result the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,467 > 4,380 mm
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is 87 mm longer when compared to the Nissan. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Suzuki probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki will be better driven but the Nissan will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,563 mm
1

Height

1,695 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4, which is by 7 percent higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, is appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Curb weight

1,405 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK