The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual which has by 3 horsepower more in relation to the Suzuki SX4 I, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Because of more horsepower the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will also provide somewhat better efficiency in specific speeds.
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes 10 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Suzuki. The Nissan, which is palced in „mini 4x4” class burns up by 1.9 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
Because of 45 Nm more torque, the engine of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Suzuki SX4 I Classic. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual consumes 0.9 l fewer fuel running around the town compared to the Suzuki. The Nissan Qashqai II, which comes from small off-road 4x4 segment, burns up 2.7 l fewer gasoline. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mini 4x4 class is 9.6 l, whereas the Nissan Qashqai II consumes by 28 percent less fuel than the average.
The Nissan features 170 liters
in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 I Classic 1.5 VVT 112HP manual.
Such a difference is quite big
therefore it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the
car’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Nissan Qashqai II has
boot capacity than the average in the
same class. Bigger
boot will be useful during family
traveling as well as while
The top speed possible to be reached by the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is higher as compared to this of the Suzuki SX4 I which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 3 km/h is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Nissan Qashqai II. The engine of the Suzuki SX4 I achieves its full efficiency at 4,400 revolutions/minute which is by 2,395 revolutions/minute lower compared with the Nissan Qashqai II.
Width of a car affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The Nissan Qashqai II is widther by 45 millimeters compared with the Suzuki and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 millimeters smaller than the width of the Nissan.
In this category it is the Nissan Qashqai II which can contain 4 liters more fuel in relation to the Suzuki SX4 I. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 segment, from which the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual comes from, amounts to 61 l, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Suzuki SX4 I Classic) it is 61 l.
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has 140 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki SX4 I. Therefore the Nissan is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
Number of gears
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual have a higher gear count compared with the Suzuki SX4 I Classic 1.5 VVT 112HP manual which means
that Nissan Qashqai II would achieve
faster speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag
racing at a timed event you would not even
feel the difference.
Maximum load capacity
The Nissan is 6 % longer when compared to the Suzuki. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual occurs to be better option for families or those who love the idea of comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki SX4 I may be more appropriate to women as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Model release date
Production of the older vehicle commenced much more earlier than its contender hence it is reasonable to suppose that this car gives way to Nissan because it has significantly less advanced technologies used.