Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual vs Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Toyota 4Runner III, model available from 1995 to 2003.
It has 2.7 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2003.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Nissan Terrano II, model available from 1993 to 2003.
It has 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 1993 to 1996.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
Toyota

16 reasons for Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152KM manual in comparison to Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

152 > 124 hp
The horsepower of the Toyota is by 23 % bigger than the Nissan. While the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

1,200 > 115 l
The trunk of the Toyota is 1,085 liters bigger in comparison to the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Toyota 4Runner III will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,100 > 1,650 l
33

Top speed

165 > 160 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Toyota 4Runner III is higher as compared to this of the Nissan which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 3 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
11

Trunk length with seats up

1,002 > 669 mm
8

Engine capacity

2,694 > 2,390 cc
The Toyota 4Runner III has 13 percent bigger engine size in relation to the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual. As the difference is not big, the Toyota 4Runner III should accelerate a bit dynamically, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual is more usable and if you regularly travel with more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual very often look more dynamic and sporty and for those who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual may be better one.
1

Model release date

1995 > 1993
Because of the fact that the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual's production began only 2 years before the Toyota, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Toyota 4Runner III might have a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.
1

Trunk length with seats down

1,698 > 1,501 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,370 > 1,299 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

Front overhang

735 > 814 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Rear overhang

1,111 > 1,117 mm
0

Curb weight

1,621 > 1,620 kg

Nissan

7 reasons for Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124KM manual in comparison to Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,755 > 1,690 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Nissan is 4 % wider than the Toyota 4Runner III. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,650 > 2,625 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual has 25 mm longer wheelbase distance than Toyota 4Runner III. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Nissan Terrano II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
9

Ground clearance

207 > 200 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the vehicle underbody and the ground. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual which has 4 percent higher ground clearance when compared with the Toyota 4Runner III. For this reason the Nissan will deal better in difficult terrain and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the car.
6

Length

4,693 > 4,470 mm
The Nissan Terrano II is 223 mm longer than the Toyota 4Runner III. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. While the Nissan Terrano II occurs to be better pick for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual may appeal to the young because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,430 > 1,422 mm
1

Height

1,852 > 1,746 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Nissan Terrano II, which is by 6 percent higher than the Toyota 4Runner III, would be better pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Front track

1,455 > 1,429 mm

Cars specifications

Toyota 4Runner III 2.7 16V 152HP manual Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1995 1993
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,305 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK