Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual vs Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

21 reasons for

Toyota Land Cruiser III, model available from 1996 to 2002.
It has 2.7 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2002.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Nissan Terrano II, model available from 1993 to 2003.
It has 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 1993 to 1996.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
Toyota

21 reasons for Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152KM manual in comparison to Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

152 > 124 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Toyota Land Cruiser III that has by 28 horsepower more in comparison to the Nissan, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Due to more horsepower the Toyota should also give somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

449 > 115 l
The trunk of the Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual is 290 % more spacious than the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Toyota will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can carry.
33

Top speed

165 > 160 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Nissan which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 3 % is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,825 > 1,755 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Toyota is larger by 70 millimeters in relation to the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” class amounts to 1,866 millimeters and is by 2 % bigger than the width of the Toyota.
19

Fuel tank

91 > 71 l
The Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual loses with the Toyota Land Cruiser III in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Toyota is able to store by 20 liters more fuel compared with the Nissan Terrano II.
15

Wheelbase

2,668 > 2,650 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Land Cruiser III has 18 mm longer wheelbase distance than Nissan Terrano II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Toyota Land Cruiser III should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

2,694 > 2,390 cc
The Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual has by 13 percent larger cubic capacity when compared to the Nissan Terrano II. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

830 > 680 kg
4

Rear track

1,507 > 1,430 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Nissan Terrano II generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano II may be a good one.
1

Model release date

1996 > 1993
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Toyota Land Cruiser III may feature more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,880 > 1,852 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Toyota Land Cruiser III, which is by 28 mm higher than the Nissan, is better choice for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,513 > 2,305 kg
0

Front track

1,506 > 1,455 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

Front overhang

766 > 814 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Rear overhang

979 > 1,117 mm
0

Curb weight

1,680 > 1,620 kg

Nissan

3 reasons for Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124KM manual in comparison to Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,650 > 837 l
6

Length

4,693 > 4,678 mm
The Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual is 15 mm longer when compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser III. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. While the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual seems to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient driving, the Toyota Land Cruiser III may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
0

End of model sale

2003 > 2002

Cars specifications

Toyota Land Cruiser III 2.7 16V 152HP manual Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1993
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,513 kg 2,305 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK