Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual vs Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

10 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Toyota Auris I Hatchback, model available from 2006.
It has 1.33VVT-i 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual
Nissan

10 reasons for Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126KM manual in comparison to Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

126 > 100 hp
The Nissan Tiida Hatchback has by 26 hp more horsepower in comparison to Toyota. The Nissan Tiida Hatchback will be distinctly faster accelerate owing to grater horsepower. Also getting ahead of cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for the Nissan Tiida Hatchback equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.4 > 13.1 s
The Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in comparison to the Nissan. The difference in the amount of 2.7 s is quite little and it should not be vitally taken into account when choosing one of compared cars.
33

Top speed

195 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan Tiida is greater than of the Toyota by 11, which allows the Nissan Tiida to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 20 kilometers/hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,604 > 2,596 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Nissan Tiida has 8 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Toyota Auris I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Nissan Tiida Hatchback should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,329 cc
The engine size of the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is by 35 percent bigger when compared to the Toyota Auris I Hatchback. As a result the Toyota Auris I will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Nissan will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

503 > 440 kg
6

Length

4,294 > 4,215 mm
The Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is 79 millimeters longer in comparison to the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual will be better driven but the Toyota Auris I will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Toyota generally look much cooler and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,534 > 1,513 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 % in favor of the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,732 > 1,721 kg

Toyota

8 reasons for Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 7.8 l
The Toyota consumes 26 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback. The difference at the level of 2 liters will be realy noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
38

Trunk capacity

352 > 300 l
If you are looking for a car for long cruises, which could room more things in the boot , choose the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual. The Nissan Tiida Hatchback has by 52 liters smaller trunk than the Nissan Tiida Hatchback so probably in this case you would be able to put in the trunk a bit less. When it comes to the luggage compartment pay attention to its width length and height which have notable impact on loading capability .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

761 > 467 l
22

Width

1,761 > 1,700 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Toyota is 61 mm wider when compared to the Nissan. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

948 > 667 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 51 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank size is Toyota which can take by 5 l more fuel compared with the Nissan Tiida.
1

Model release date

2006 > 2004
Given that the Nissan Tiida's production began only 2 years prior to the Toyota, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual might have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
0

Curb weight

1,280 > 1,232 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,732 kg 1,721 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK