Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Opel Antara SUV, model available from 2006.
It has 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Opel

18 reasons for Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 106 hp
The Opel Antara has 34 hp more horsepower in relation to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. The Opel Antara SUV will be distinctly better speed up owing to bigger horsepower. Also passing other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for the Opel Antara equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

220 > 145 Nm
The Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 has 75 Nm more torque when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. Although most of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it presents the best how fast a car acclerates. In this case the difference is of considerable size thus the Opel will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.9 > 14.4 s
A little difference at the level of 17 percent shows that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV segment, being represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 10.9 s and is by 32 % higher than this of Suzuki vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

422 > 186 l
The boot of the Opel is 236 l bigger compared to the Suzuki. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Opel Antara SUV will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
33

Top speed

175 > 160 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Opel Antara is greater in relation to the Suzuki by 9, which allows the Opel Antara to cover faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,850 > 1,810 mm
Width of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Opel is larger by 40 mm in comparison to the Suzuki and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” class amounts to around 1,797 mm and is by 3 percent smaller than the same attribute of the Opel.
19

Range

677 > 671 km
19

Fuel tank

65 > 55 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Opel Antara SUV which is able to take by 18 % more fuel compared with the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV.
15

Wheelbase

2,713 > 2,636 mm
Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 has 3 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
11

Extra-urban range

890 > 775 km
8

Engine capacity

2,406 > 1,587 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Opel is by 52 % bigger in relation to the Suzuki. In a consequence the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Opel will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,570 > 4,467 mm
The Opel Antara is 103 millimeters longer in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. The length of the car is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Opel Antara SUV very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Opel will be better driven but the Suzuki Grand Vitara II will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,570 mm
1

Model release date

2006 > 2005
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Opel Antara SUV may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,704 > 1,695 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 1 percent to the advantage of the Opel Antara is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,560 > 1,540 mm

Suzuki

6 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 9.6 l
The Suzuki uses 14 % less in the combined cycle when compared to the Opel Antara SUV. The difference at the level of 1.3 l is not perceptible. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 13.2 l
The fuel economy in city traffic is considerably to the Suzuki's advantage. This car burns 23 percent less petrol in built up area in comparison to the Opel. Better fuel consumption equals an increase in cruising range.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,067 > 863 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 7.5 l
12

Urban range

539 > 489 km
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm

Cars specifications

Opel Antara SUV 2.4 ECOTEC 140HP manual 4x4 Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,495 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK