Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual vs Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan, model available from 2010.
It has 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Toyota Verso-S, model available from 2011 to 2013.
It has 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP petrol engine produced from 2011 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual
Opel

17 reasons for Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120KM manual in comparison to Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

120 > 99 hp
The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Opel that has by 21 horsepower more in comparison to the Toyota Verso-S, which makes this vehicle slightly better in terms of high speed. Because of more horsepower the Opel Meriva II should also give a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

175 > 123 Nm
Due to 52 Nm greater torque, the engine of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Toyota. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 13.3 s
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11.5 s, which is 1.8 s in comparison to the Toyota Verso-S. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,498 > 1,024 l
33

Top speed

188 > 170 km/h
The top speed of the Opel Meriva II is greater as compared to this of the Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 18 kilometers/hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual. The engine of the Toyota Verso-S reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 2,255 revolutions/minute lower compared with the Opel.
22

Width

1,912 > 1,695 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan is larger by 217 millimeters than the Toyota Verso-S and is not really relevant. The average for the „microvan” segment equals to around 1,748 mm and is by 9 % smaller than the same attribute of the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,548 mm
Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual has 96 mm longer wheelbase than the Toyota. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,687 > 1,329 cc
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan has 27 percent larger engine displacement in comparison to the Toyota. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Opel Meriva II should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement means worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,290 > 3,995 mm
The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual is 7 percent longer when compared to the Toyota. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Opel Meriva II will be better driven ,however, the Toyota will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,512 > 1,461 mm
1

Height

1,616 > 1,594 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Opel, which is by 22 mm higher than the Toyota, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,485 > 1,470 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Toyota

9 reasons for Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99KM manual in comparison to Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.4 > 6.2 l
The Toyota Verso-S consumes 13 percent less fuel in the combined cycle than the Opel Meriva II. The Toyota Verso-S, being palced in „microvan” class consumes by 0.7 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.1 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 8.2 l
The Toyota burns 1.7 l less fuel in the city in relation to the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan. The difference at the level of 21 % will be very big in use of vehicle. Additionally, during years it may generate gigantic cost savings. Moreover note that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably raised if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

484 > 397 l
The Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual features 87 liters more capable boot in relation to the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual. Such a difference is big and it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual has 19 % bigger trunk capacity than the average in the same class. Roomy luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling as well as while daily car’s usage.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.8 > 5.2 l
19

Range

1,019 > 871 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 54 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Toyota that is able to take by 4 % more fuel than the Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual.
12

Urban range

846 > 651 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,146 > 1,080 km
1

Model release date

2011 > 2010
Given that the Opel started to be manufactured only 1 year prior to the Toyota, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Toyota Verso-S may have a bit more new solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Opel Meriva II Mikrovan 1.4 LPG Turbo ecoFLEX 120HP manual Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 798 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class microvan microvan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK