Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual vs Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

19 reasons for

Opel Mokka, model available from 2012.
It has 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Suzuki Jimny Standard, model available from 1998.
It has 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2002.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
Opel

19 reasons for Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 80 hp
The Opel has by 60 horsepowers more horsepower compared to Suzuki Jimny Standard. The Opel Mokka will be distinctly better accelerate owing to grater power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 104 Nm
The Opel Mokka has 92 percent more torque in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny. The difference at such level is relevant, so that the Opel Mokka will be seeding up significantly faster.
38

Trunk capacity

354 > 112 l
The boot of the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual is 216 % larger compared to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Opel Mokka will be much more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Top speed

193 > 140 km/h
The Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual has by 38 percent higher maximum velocity in comparison to the Suzuki, consequently a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be traveled in much more shorter period of time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,850 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is produced clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Opel. The engine of the Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4 achieves its full efficiency at 4,500 revolutions/minute which is by 2,650 revolutions per minute worst result compared with the Opel.
22

Width

1,777 > 1,600 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Opel Mokka is widther only by 11 % in relation to the Suzuki and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” segment equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 1 % smaller than the same attribute of the Opel Mokka.
19

Fuel tank

54 > 40 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual that can carry 14 liters more fuel in comparison to the Suzuki Jimny. The average fuel container capacity in the compact SUV segment, which is represented by the Opel, is 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 class (represented by the Suzuki) it is 61 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,551 > 2,259 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Opel Mokka has 13 percent longer wheelbase distance in relation to Suzuki. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Opel Mokka should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Opel have a higher speed count in relation to the Suzuki which means that Opel Mokka will have better acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not notice the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,365 > 1,300 cc
The Opel Mokka has by 65 cc greater engine capacity than the Suzuki Jimny Standard. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

4,278 > 3,645 mm
The Opel is 633 millimeters longer when compared to the Suzuki Jimny Standard. Long cars are more spacious and usually provide bigger trunk. While the Opel seems to be better pick for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Suzuki may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,542 > 1,365 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual is more convenient and if you frequently drive with more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Suzuki Jimny generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Suzuki might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2012 > 1998
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,540 > 1,355 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Suzuki

2 reasons for Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

817 > 783 l
1

Height

1,705 > 1,658 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Suzuki Jimny, which is by 3 % higher than the Opel Mokka, is appropriate choice for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Cars specifications

Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual Suzuki Jimny Standard 1.3 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,418 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK