The Subaru Forester IV has 109 % more horsepower compared to Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual. The Subaru will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to grater power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
When you push the gas and you start speeding up rapidly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 as it has 195 Nm more torque in relation to the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 you will have a pleasurable feeling of getting pushed back in the seat as the car accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Subaru accelerates to 100k\h by
compared to the Opel Mokka. A noticable difference in
acceleration in favor of the Subaru Forester IV will allow him to overtake much
quicker and avoid other obstacles.
With more boot size the Subaru Forester IV will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional vehicle compared with the Opel Mokka. If the capacity of the trunk is important to you, the Subaru will be better to buy because it is around 151 l larger than the boot of the Opel.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The Subaru Forester IV has by
30 % higher maximum
speed than the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual, consequently a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be
drived in much more shorter period of time. The difference may be perceptible
during travelling over fast and long
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. Still, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always recommended to see a torque performance graph.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Subaru Forester IV is 18 mm wider in relation to the Opel Mokka. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Opel is worst that the Subaru Forester IV in the category of fuel tank size. The Subaru Forester IV is able to carry by 13 % more fuel than its rival.
Subaru Forester IV has 3 percent longer wheelbase than the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
The Subaru Forester IV has by 400 cubic centimeters larger cubic capacity in relation to the Opel Mokka. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values does not vary much.
The Subaru Forester IV is 7 percent longer than the Opel Mokka. The length of the car is significant in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Subaru Forester IV will be better driven but the Opel Mokka 1.6 Ecotec 115HP manual will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
A Boxer put in the
Subaru Forester IV is significantly
better because it can be shorter and
lighter and produces less vibrations compared to In-line engine.
What is more bear in mind
that its horizontal
layout causes that a
automobile has the benefit of a lower center of
gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one
put in the Opel Mokka, is that due
to its simplicity of
construction it can be cheaper compared to
other types of engines.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Opel's production began only 1 year before the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Subaru Forester IV may feature a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
For a comfortable travelling around town, it is worth to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison can have a big impact on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.