Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual vs Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual

Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Charles01 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

22 reasons for

Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d, model available from 2012.
It has 1.0 VTI 68HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback, model available from 1994 to 2001.
It has 1.0 45HP petrol engine produced from 1994 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual
Peugeot

22 reasons for Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68KM manual in comparison to Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

68 > 45 hp
The Peugeot has 23 hp more horsepower compared to Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual. The Peugeot will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to grater power. Also getting ahead of cars or obstacles while driving should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger engine.
112

Average consumption

4.3 > 6.6 l
The Peugeot burns up 35 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. The difference at the level of 2.3 l will be quite very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it would allow you to make a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

94 > 76 Nm
Maximum torque of the Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual is 18 Nm greater than the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. For this reason, the Peugeot will accelerate somewhat faster and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Peugeot will burn up less fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

5.1 > 6.9 l
The Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d burns up of 26 percent fuel fewer running around the town than the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. The Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d, as a representative of supermini class, burns up 2.4 l/100Km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small cars” segment equals to 7.5 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

14 > 21.4 s
If a fast driving is what you realy like, the Peugeot 208 will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 35 % better in comparison to the Volkswagen.
38

Trunk capacity

311 > 243 l
With more boot size the Peugeot will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one than the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual. If the size of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual will be better choice as it is about 28 percent more spacious than the trunk of its contender.
33

Top speed

163 > 145 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Peugeot is greater as compared to this of the Volkswagen which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 12 % is small and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 5.3 l
22

Width

1,741 > 1,632 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Peugeot 208 is 7 % wider in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,163 > 682 km
19

Fuel tank

51 > 45 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Peugeot which can hold 6 liters more fuel in relation to the Volkswagen. The medium fuel container capacity in the supermini class, from which the Peugeot comes from, is 44 liters, whereas in subcompact class (represented by the Volkswagen) it equals 44 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,537 > 2,403 mm
Peugeot 208 has 134 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

980 > 634 km
11

Trunk length with seats up

696 > 411 mm
11

Extra-urban range

1,316 > 849 km
6

Length

3,962 > 3,743 mm
The Peugeot is 219 millimeters longer in relation to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Peugeot 208 will be better driven but the Volkswagen will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
1

Model release date

2012 > 1994
0

Trunk height

508 > 498 mm
0

Payload

1,487 > 1,370 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

12 > 8
0

Curb weight

975 > 857 kg

Volkswagen

6 reasons for Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

977 > 809 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,795 > 2,995 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered determines how fast an engine reaches its best efficiency with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the wider range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,043 > 1,000 cc
The Volkswagen has 43 cubic centimeters greater engine size compared to the Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual. As the difference is not big, the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback should accelerate slightly better, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 509 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Peugeot 208 Hatchback 5d 1.0 VTI 68HP manual Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 1994
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,487 kg 1,370 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK