The fuel economy is considerably to Renault's advantage. This automobile consumes 1.8 l less gasoline in the combined cycle in comparison to the Peugeot 3008. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Renault is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Renault needs by 32 % less amount of fuel than the average.
The Renault Captur uses 3.4 l fewer fuel in city traffic than the Peugeot 3008 1.6 120HP manual. The difference at the level of 36 % will be very significant in everyday use of vehicle. Additionally, during many months it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
Maximal torque RPM
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to analyze a torque graph.
Number of gears
The Renault Captur have a higher gear count
in comparison to the Peugeot 3008 which means
that Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual would have
faster speeding up and better fuel
economy. But the difference is quiet
little and if you are not drag
racer at a timed event you would not
notice the difference.
Model release date
Given that the Peugeot 3008's production started only 4 years prior to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual, the distance in technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Renault might have a bit more advanced solutions used in it.