Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual vs Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72HP manual

Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Skoda Rapid II Liftback, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 TSI 85HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Peugeot 301, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 VTi 72HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72HP manual
Skoda

17 reasons for Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

85 > 72 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Skoda which has by 18 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Peugeot 301, which makes this car a bit faster. Due to more horsepower the Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual should also give a bit better efficiency in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

5 > 5.3 l
The Skoda burns up 0.3 l fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Peugeot. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not perceptible. However in the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

159 > 109 Nm
The Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual has 46 % more torque when compared to the Peugeot. The difference at this level is quite big, so that the Skoda Rapid II will accelerate perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 7 l
The fuel consumption of the Skoda Rapid II is 0.5 l better in comparison to the Peugeot 301. Despite the difference is insensible, in the long term it can make that your car would be noticably less expensive to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.8 > 14.2 s
The Peugeot 301 can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared to the Skoda. The difference at the level of 17 percent is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken by you into as important for selecting the better one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

550 > 506 l
If you are looking for a car for long trips, which could room more things in the boot , decide to buy the Skoda. The Peugeot has by 9 percent smaller luggage compartment in relation to the Peugeot 301 so probably you would be able to take with you a bit less. Assessing the trunk check its dimensions which have considerable effect on loading possibility ( Trunk dimensions of Peugeot 301 - 1,031 millimeters/549 mm).
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,489 > 1,037 l
33

Top speed

183 > 160 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual is greater compared with the Peugeot by 23 kilometers/hour, which allows the Skoda Rapid II Liftback to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 14 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 2,995 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual. The engine of the Peugeot 301 achieves its full efficiency at 2,995 revolutions per minute which is by 1,500 revolutions/minute lower compared with the Skoda Rapid II.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.4 > 4.5 l
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Maximum load capacity

535 > 479 kg
6

Length

4,483 > 4,442 mm
The Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual is 1 % longer when compared to the Peugeot. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. While the Skoda Rapid II occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Peugeot 301 may appeal to the young as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally means a hatchback and for that reason the Skoda, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats giving more space for cargo, has an advantage on the 4-door Peugeot which in turn has smaller lid and a partition behind the rear seats.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,626 > 1,464 kg
0

Curb weight

1,085 > 976 kg

Peugeot

9 reasons for Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72KM manual in comparison to Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,753 > 1,706 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Peugeot is 3 % wider in comparison to the Skoda. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,661 > 2,606 mm
Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Skoda. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
11

Trunk length with seats up

1,091 > 1,047 mm
8

Engine capacity

1,200 > 1,198 cc
The Peugeot 301 has by 2 cc greater engine size than the Skoda Rapid II. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
1

Height

1,466 > 1,463 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Peugeot, which is by 3 mm higher than the Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual, is appropriate option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Trunk width

1,031 > 1,010 mm
0

Front overhang

817 > 877 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

1,953 > 1,943 mm
0

Rear overhang

976 > 1,005 mm

Cars specifications

Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual Peugeot 301 1.2 VTi 72HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,104 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK