Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual vs Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual

Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Charles01 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

17 reasons for

Peugeot 301, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 HDi 92HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Skoda Rapid II Liftback, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 TSI 85HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual
Peugeot

17 reasons for Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92KM manual in comparison to Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

92 > 85 hp
The horsepower of the Peugeot is by 7 horsepowers grater in relation to the Skoda. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance largely.
112

Average consumption

4.1 > 5 l
The Peugeot 301 consumes 18 % less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Skoda. The difference at the level of 0.9 l is not perceptible. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would give a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

229 > 159 Nm
The Peugeot 301 has 44 percent more torque than the Skoda Rapid II Liftback. Although a great deal of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when choosing a car, it describes the best how fast a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is quite big hence the Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual will provide you with better sensation of driving.
56

Urban consumption

4.8 > 6.5 l
The Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual uses 26 percent less diesel running around the town than the Skoda. The difference at the level of 26 percent is quite noticeable in everyday usage of the ride. Moreover, in a long term it will give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.2 > 11.8 s
The Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 11.2 s, which is 5 % faster than the Skoda Rapid II Liftback. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 4.4 l
22

Width

1,753 > 1,706 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The width of the Peugeot 301 is larger only by 47 mm in comparison to the Skoda and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „C” class is around 1,703 millimeters and is by 3 % larger than the same attribute of the Peugeot 301.
15

Wheelbase

2,661 > 2,606 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Skoda Rapid II Liftback. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Peugeot should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
11

Trunk length with seats up

1,091 > 1,047 mm
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,198 cc
The engine capacity of the Peugeot 301 is by 30 % greater than the Skoda Rapid II. As a result the Skoda Rapid II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Peugeot 301 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
1

Height

1,466 > 1,463 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Peugeot 301, which is by 3 mm higher than the Skoda Rapid II Liftback, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,031 > 1,010 mm
0

Front overhang

817 > 877 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

1,953 > 1,943 mm
0

Rear overhang

976 > 1,005 mm
0

Curb weight

1,086 > 1,085 kg

Skoda

8 reasons for Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

550 > 506 l
The boot of the Skoda Rapid II is only 44 liters bigger than the Peugeot 301. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,489 > 1,037 l
33

Top speed

183 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Skoda Rapid II is greater in comparison to of the Peugeot 301 by 3 km/h, which allows the Skoda Rapid II Liftback to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers per hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 1,745 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine achieves its best performance with increase in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt faster.
8

Maximum load capacity

535 > 458 kg
6

Length

4,483 > 4,442 mm
The Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual is 41 mm longer when compared to the Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual. The length of the car is important when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Skoda will be better driven ,however, the Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and because of that the Skoda Rapid II, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat making more room, has an advantage on the four-door Peugeot 301 which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
0

Payload

1,626 > 1,553 kg

Cars specifications

Peugeot 301 1.6 HDi 92HP manual Skoda Rapid II Liftback 1.2 TSI 85HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,104 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK