Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual vs Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

14 reasons for

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.6 100HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 16V 109HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual
Volvo

14 reasons for Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.9 > 7.4 l
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual consumes 7 percent fewer in the combined cycle in comparison to the Peugeot. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless within some time it would give a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

150 > 146 Nm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual has 3 percent more torque in comparison to the Peugeot 307 II. Even though the majority of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a car, it describes the best how a vehicle acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

9.3 > 10 l
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual uses 0.7 l fewer petrol in city traffic than the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual. The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, which comes from small family cars segment, uses 0.6 l less fuel. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small family cars class equals to 8.7 l, whereas the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d burns up by 7 % more amount of fuel than the average.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.7 > 6 l
22

Width

1,778 > 1,740 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Volvo C30 is 38 mm wider than the Peugeot 307 II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,647 > 2,610 mm
The Volvo has 1 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Peugeot 307 II. As a result the Volvo is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,588 cc
The Volvo has by 9 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity when compared to the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,271 > 4,212 mm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d is 1 % longer when compared to the Peugeot. Long cars have more interior space and also have more storage space. Although the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,531 > 1,499 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2006 > 2005
Because of the fact that the Peugeot debuted only 1 year before the Volvo C30, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Volvo may have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Payload

1,700 > 1,696 kg
0

Front track

1,535 > 1,505 mm
0

Curb weight

1,274 > 1,266 kg

Peugeot

12 reasons for Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109KM manual in comparison to Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

109 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Peugeot that has by 9 horsepower more than the Volvo, which makes this vehicle somewhat faster. Due to more horsepower the Peugeot will also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.7 > 11.8 s
A small difference in the amount of 1.1 s suggests that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d is insensibly beaten in this confrontation. In the „lower middle” class, to which the Volvo C30 is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.5 s faster than acceleration of Volvo’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

190 > 185 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Peugeot 307 II is greater than of the Volvo C30 by 3, which allows the Peugeot to cover faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to check a torque graph.
19

Range

811 > 743 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 52 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Peugeot that is able to carry by 17 percent more petrol in comparison to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual.
12

Urban range

600 > 559 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,034 > 912 km
8

Maximum load capacity

438 > 425 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Peugeot is more usable and if you regularly drive with more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Volvo very often look much cooler and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,522 > 1,477 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 45 mm to the advantage of the Peugeot is small and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,800 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,204 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK