Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual vs Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.6 100HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
Peugeot

15 reasons for Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 6.9 l
The Peugeot consumes 2 liters fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Volvo. The difference in the amount of 29 percent will be quite perceptible in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it would give a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

214 > 150 Nm
Due to 64 Nm more torque, the engine of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 9.3 l
The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback uses of 34 % diesel less in city traffic compared to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual, as a representative of lower middle class, consumes of 2.6 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “C” segment is 8.7 l per 100 km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,745 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
Such a huge difference stems from the fact that both compared vehicles are equipped with various engines. The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual has the diesel engine and the Volvo C30 has the petrol engine. Taking into account different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic has no sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.7 l
19

Range

1,224 > 743 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 52 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback which can carry 9 liters more fuel in relation to the Volvo. The average fuel tank capacity in the C segment, which is represented by the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, amounts to 52 liters, whereas in compact segment (represented by the Volvo C30) it is 52 liters.
12

Urban range

984 > 559 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,395 > 912 km
8

Maximum load capacity

481 > 425 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Peugeot is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Volvo C30 very often look much cooler and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Volvo might be a good one.
1

Height

1,522 > 1,477 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, which is by 45 mm higher than the Volvo, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,766 > 1,700 kg
0

Curb weight

1,293 > 1,274 kg

Volvo

11 reasons for Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

100 > 90 hp
The horsepower of the Volvo C30 is by 10 hp bigger in relation to the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual. Because the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.8 > 12.5 s
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 11.8 s, which is 0.7 s faster in comparison to the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a ride.
33

Top speed

185 > 179 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo C30 is greater than this of the Peugeot 307 II by 3, which allows the Volvo to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,778 > 1,740 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Volvo C30 is 38 mm wider in comparison to the Peugeot. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,647 > 2,610 mm
The Volvo C30 has 37 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual. As a result the Volvo is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,561 cc
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual has by 2 % greater engine displacement in comparison to the Peugeot. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

4,271 > 4,212 mm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual is 59 millimeters longer than the Peugeot 307 II. Long cars more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Volvo seems to be better choice for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual may be more appropriate to women because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,531 > 1,499 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2006 > 2005
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Front track

1,535 > 1,505 mm

Cars specifications

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,364 kg -
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2005 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK