Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual vs Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 PureTech 110HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

9 reasons for

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.6 100HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
Peugeot

20 reasons for Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110KM manual in comparison to Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

110 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d which has by 10 horsepower more than the Volvo, which makes this car slightly faster. With more horsepower the Peugeot will also provide a bit more efficiency in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 6.9 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual's advantage. This vehicle consumes 33 percent less gasoline in the combined cycle compared to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the lower middle segment, in which the Peugeot is classified, equals to 6.8 l whereas the Peugeot consumes by 32 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

204 > 150 Nm
The Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual has 36 percent more torque in comparison to the Volvo C30. Even though most of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when choosing a vehicle, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is of considerable size and for that reason the Peugeot will deliver you better sensation of driving.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 9.3 l
The Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual uses 38 percent less fuel in city traffic compared with the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. The difference at the level of 38 % is quite significant in using vehicle. Additionally, during years it will generate huge savings. Moreover bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably increased if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.1 > 11.8 s
A little difference at the level of 0.7 s shows that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „C segment, being represented by the Volvo C30, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 11.3 s and is by 4 % higher than this of Volvo car.
33

Top speed

188 > 185 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Peugeot 308 II is greater in comparison to of the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d by 2, which allows the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers/hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Peugeot. The engine of the Volvo C30 reaches its full efficiency at 4,000 revolutions/minute which is by 63 % worst result than the Peugeot 308 II.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 5.7 l
22

Width

1,809 > 1,778 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual is 31 mm wider than the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,152 > 743 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 52 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Peugeot which can contain 2 l more fuel in relation to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. The medium fuel tank size in the lower middle segment, from which the Peugeot 308 II comes from, amounts to 52 liters, whereas in small family cars class (represented by the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d) it amounts to 52 l.
12

Urban range

914 > 559 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,359 > 912 km
8

Maximum load capacity

450 > 425 kg
4

Rear track

1,553 > 1,531 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Peugeot is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual may be more appropriate.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Manufacture of the older vehicle started much more earlier than its competitor hence it seems to be right to assume that this car gives way to Peugeot 308 II because it has significantly less modern technologies applied.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,722 > 1,700 kg
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,535 mm

Volvo

9 reasons for Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Reasons for
15

Wheelbase

2,647 > 2,620 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual has 27 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Peugeot 308 II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,200 cc
The Volvo C30 has 397 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity than the Peugeot 308 II. The difference is relatively considerable. As a result the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size usually results in worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,271 > 4,249 mm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d is 1 percent longer than the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Volvo very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Volvo C30 will be better driven ,however, the Peugeot 308 II will be a little easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,477 > 1,456 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of stuff to it. The difference of 21 millimeters in favor of the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,039 > 2,038 mm
0

Curb weight

1,274 > 1,265 kg

Cars specifications

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2013 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,722 kg 1,700 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK