Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual vs Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual

Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Charles01 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic

19 reasons for

Peugeot 605, model available from 1989 to 2000.
It has 3.0 167HP petrol engine produced from 1989 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Volvo V70 I, model available from 1997 to 2000.
It has 2.0 126HP petrol engine produced from 1997 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual
Peugeot

19 reasons for Peugeot 605 3.0 167KM manual in comparison to Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

167 > 126 hp
The Peugeot 605 comes with petrol which delivers by 41 more horsepower than the Volvo V70 I, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be googd choice for drivers who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 11.9 s
A little difference at the level of 2.2 s shows that the Volvo V70 I is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „E segment, being represented by the Volvo V70 I, the average acceleration is 9.7 s and is by 23 % higher than this of Volvo car.
38

Trunk capacity

497 > 420 l
The Peugeot 605 features 77 liters bigger trunk compared with the Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual. Such a difference is big so it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Peugeot 605 has 3 l bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Roomy boot will be useful during family journeys as well as during daily driving.
33

Top speed

222 > 195 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Peugeot 605 is greater as compared to this of the Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 14 percent is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

1,802 > 1,758 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Peugeot 605 is widther only by 3 percent compared with the Volvo V70 I and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „E” segment is 1,826 millimeters and is by 1 percent bigger than the same attribute of the Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

81 > 70 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Peugeot 605 that can hold by 11 liters more fuel in relation to the Volvo V70 I.
15

Wheelbase

2,796 > 2,671 mm
The Peugeot 605 has 5 % longer wheelbase than Volvo V70 I. As a result the Peugeot 605 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

6 > 5
12

Urban range

533 > 522 km
8

Engine capacity

2,964 > 1,985 cc
The engine size of the Peugeot 605 is by 49 percent larger when compared to the Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual. For this reason the Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Peugeot 605 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,726 > 4,722 mm
The Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual is 4 mm longer than the Volvo. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Peugeot 605 occurs to be better for families or persons who value convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Volvo may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a upgraded construction of a straight engine which as far as we are concerned is a better choice. Engine of V layout installed in a vehicle the Peugeot gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
4

Rear track

1,526 > 1,468 mm
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,030 > 1,970 kg
0

Front track

1,526 > 1,521 mm
0

Valves

12 > 10
0

Curb weight

1,529 > 1,473 kg

Volvo

5 reasons for Volvo V70 I 2.0 126KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

13.4 > 15 l
The Volvo V70 I uses 1.6 l fewer in the urban cycle when compared to the Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual. The difference at the level of 1.6 l is not realy noticeable in daily use of the automobile, however, during the period of a several months it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally means a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Volvo, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats making more room, has an advantage on the 4-door Peugeot 605 which in turn has a smaller trunk cut off from the passenger compartment.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

1997 > 1989
Manufacture of the older car began 8 years prior to Peugeot 605 and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle is equipped with significantly less advanced solutions applied.
1

Height

1,428 > 1,417 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Volvo V70 I, which is by 1 percent higher than the Peugeot 605, would be better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Cars specifications

Peugeot 605 3.0 167HP manual Volvo V70 I 2.0 126HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1989 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class E E
    Payload 2,030 kg 1,970 kg

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK