The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers attach the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Subaru Forester IV, that has by 150 more horsepower than the Renault Captur, which makes this vehicle really quicker. Due to more horsepower the Subaru Forester IV will as well give distinctly more flexiblility in specific gears.
When you step on the gas and you start accelerating quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Subaru Forester IV as it has by 215 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. These two vehicles vary so much that only driving the Subaru you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pushed back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a dynamic driving is what you are really in to, the Subaru will appeal to you because it’s
acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is
better compared to
the Renault Captur.
The Subaru features 128 l
compared with the Renault.
Such a difference is quite big
therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the
vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 has
boot capacity than the average in the
same class. More spacious
boot will be useful during family
journeys as well as during
Trunk capacity with seats down
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual has by 29 percent smaller top velocity in comparison to the Subaru, thanks to which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways to the car of Subaru brand advantage.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. Still, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque graph.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Subaru Forester IV is 17 mm wider in relation to the Renault Captur. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Subaru Forester IV that can contain 33 percent more fuel in relation to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4, is 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual) it is 61 l.
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Subaru has 1 percent longer wheelbase distance than Renault Captur. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Subaru Forester IV should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Subaru Forester IV has 1,100 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement than the Renault Captur. Such a huge difference makes that comparision of this values is aimless. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual seems to be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and car operating costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided to buy the Subaru Forester IV should take adventage of grater power, flexibility, culture of the engine and as a consequence more fun from driving.
The Subaru is 474 mm longer in relation to the Renault Captur. The length of the car is significant in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Subaru Forester IV will be better driven but the Renault will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
A Boxer engine installed in the
Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is significantly
better because it can be shorter and
lighter and generates less vibrations than engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line.
What is more you should keep in mind
design causes that a
vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of
gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one
installed in the Renault Captur, is that because of its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to
other types of engines.
To those who appreciate more functional driving a vehicle and who don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend cars with automatic gearbox. To those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.