Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

23 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Subaru

23 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers attach the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Subaru Forester IV, that has by 150 more horsepower than the Renault Captur, which makes this vehicle really quicker. Due to more horsepower the Subaru Forester IV will as well give distinctly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 135 Nm
When you step on the gas and you start accelerating quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Subaru Forester IV as it has by 215 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. These two vehicles vary so much that only driving the Subaru you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pushed back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 12.9 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are really in to, the Subaru will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 5.4 s better compared to the Renault Captur.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 377 l
The Subaru features 128 l bigger boot compared with the Renault. Such a difference is quite big therefore it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 has 60 l bigger boot capacity than the average in the same class. More spacious boot will be useful during family journeys as well as during everyday driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,579 > 453 l
33

Top speed

221 > 171 km/h
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual has by 29 percent smaller top velocity in comparison to the Subaru, thanks to which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways to the car of Subaru brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. Still, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to check a torque graph.
22

Width

1,795 > 1,778 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Subaru Forester IV is 17 mm wider in relation to the Renault Captur. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 46 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Subaru Forester IV that can contain 33 percent more fuel in relation to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4, is 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual) it is 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,634 > 2,601 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Subaru has 1 percent longer wheelbase distance than Renault Captur. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Subaru Forester IV should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 899 cc
The Subaru Forester IV has 1,100 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement than the Renault Captur. Such a huge difference makes that comparision of this values is aimless. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual seems to be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and car operating costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided to buy the Subaru Forester IV should take adventage of grater power, flexibility, culture of the engine and as a consequence more fun from driving.
6

Length

4,596 > 4,122 mm
The Subaru is 474 mm longer in relation to the Renault Captur. The length of the car is significant in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Subaru Forester IV will be better driven but the Renault will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,514 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine installed in the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is significantly better because it can be shorter and lighter and generates less vibrations than engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. What is more you should keep in mind its horizontal design causes that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one installed in the Renault Captur, is that because of its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To those who appreciate more functional driving a vehicle and who don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend cars with automatic gearbox. To those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,545 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,100 kg

Renault

8 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 8.3 l
The Renault uses 39 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 39 percent will be realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long run it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 11.2 l
The Renault Captur uses 5.2 l of petrol fewer running around the town compared to the Subaru Forester IV. The Renault, which comes from compact SUV segment, burns up 3.6 l fewer petrol, which is by 37 % better result in comparison to the average in its class. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is really significant, so note that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should pick up models with similar characteristics.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 7 l
19

Range

918 > 706 km
12

Urban range

750 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,047 > 857 km
8

Maximum load capacity

557 > 497 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK